A lot reviewers are abusing some stereotypical numbers.. and i was thinking, i need to do something about it, and there it is! You can use 0-10 as you was used to, but there are some news:
0 - For biggest trash 1 - Big trash, but better than biggest trash 2/Banned, no one even using it 3 - Bad 4/Banned 5 - Average 6 - Good 7/Banned, a lot people abuse it 8/Banned, part of rebalance update 9 - Awesome 10 - Perfect
Post number #987776, ID: 5d0f2b
|
There is list of allowed numbers for memorize:
Negative: 0, 1, 3 Neutral: 5 Positive: 6, 9, 10 ------------------- if you found this thread interesting, i will be happy if you will rate me over this new system!
Post number #987777, ID: 5d0f2b
|
Also you can try rate your favourite, hated movies, videogames or anything! ^^ i think it will be more interesting than 7/10 on mal
Post number #987778, ID: 6c3759
|
this is a 0/10 threade
Post number #987779, ID: 5d0f2b
|
>>987778 i needed to make fix update, "-1/10" allowed only for your post
Post number #987783, ID: ab7993
|
1/10 If we're banning numbers, 0 and 10 should be banned because 10 is unrealistic hyperbole. Perfection doesn't exit. Similar thought process with 0 Now the allowed numbers are 1, 3, 5, 6, and 9
But notice that's 5 numbers only. So the 5star scale system is best
Post number #987784, ID: ab7993
|
Maybe you can keep 0. So 0/5
Post number #987796, ID: 330ecb
|
>>987775 I give your post a trash fire/10.
Post number #987810, ID: 5d0f2b
|
>>987783 this is truth.. but how you want rate some kind of things trash what isn't funny, and than trash which is close to same terrible, but at Łeast there was attempts to make it well? 9, 10 can may works because a lot people won't bother. But stars rating isn't acceptable, because we can't allow them. only algebra.
Post number #987832, ID: bdc790
|
Maybe seven or eight
Post number #987833, ID: 3d6b50
|
this is either 6 or 9, wish there is something in between them
Post number #987861, ID: b0d34e
|
>>987833 people abuse 7/10 too much.. and 8 is little similar.. since now good things are 6, so maybe we won't have 7/10 sum anymore but maybe something as 6.58 or so
Post number #987880, ID: 701ef7
|
>>987775 Does "average" (5/10) in this case mean "acceptable" or "mediocre?"
Post number #987881, ID: 701ef7
|
Also in any case, trying to quantify your enjoyment of something often leaves out important nuance. A game like Pathologic or Andy and Leyley might be rated low because those games are (to some extent) purposefully alienating to a lot of people. However, both games definitely have an audience that really enjoys these games for what they are, in whole or in part.
Post number #987883, ID: 5d0f2b
|
>>987867>>987868 i'm sorry :c >>987881 rating is always subjective, and even most hated things can be good one for someone else. in this way i think everyone should find someone who have similar taste as the person, and share recomendations each other.. do you like pathologic? than is good idea to find other fans of pathologic and than sure check what things they also like.. for example i love /u/ because of lain, and other people would said it's "chinese cartoons".
Post number #987884, ID: 5d0f2b
|
>>987880 yes, i think 5/10 is something what wasn't give any emotions probably. not good but negative either, generic something blank/souless in some way. 6 is something good, but but not so special. i don't want guide people to abuse it but i think 6/10 is new 7/10. 9/10 is something awesome. 10/10 should use really rarely. For example if you are lain fan, and you love SEL. 9/10 can be in this case gits, akira, ergo proxy. umaru 6, tokyo ghoul 5, pop team epic 3, boku no pico 1...
Post number #987885, ID: 5d0f2b
|
pick 0 sounds really difficult.. i have in mind something as the amazing bulk or The VVitch, they are memorable to be bad, terribly long in my case etc.
Post number #987933, ID: ce6ae3
|
6/5 schlechter als Wolfteam
Post number #987938, ID: ca4241
|
1-5 is the perfect system, even better with decimals:
1/5 = A depressing waste of time 2/5 = Boooring 3/5 = Meh/Uninspired/Mid 3.5/5 = Mid but had some interesting parts to it 4/5 = Enjoyable! 4.5/5 = I *really* enjoyed this, but it could have been even better. Argh. New hyperfixation unlocked. 5/5 = It does what it's trying to do more of less flawlessly. It would be a shame to miss out on this.
Post number #987948, ID: 5d0f2b
|
>>987938 i'm sorry, my fingers don't have dots ;-;
Post number #988079, ID: 8660b8
|
>>987948 that's what joints are for
Post number #988304, ID: b48ab4
|
Go fuck yourself
Post number #988416, ID: e2c0f0
|
>>987775 2/10 thread only because i replied
Post number #988419, ID: 5d0f2b
|
>>988416 sorry your voting is invalid, you can rate it as big trash or bad
Post number #988428, ID: 6e51fb
|
>>988419 2/10 you're invalid
Post number #988429, ID: 5d0f2b
|
>>988428 no, i'm dzsnfstz, judz as ascii or something, i'm based and lainpilled you furrack
Post number #988430, ID: 5d0f2b
|
*defining just
Total number of posts: 29,
last modified on:
Wed Jan 1 00:00:00 1701580003
| Hi!
A lot reviewers are abusing some stereotypical numbers.. and i was thinking, i need to do something about it, and there it is! You can use 0-10 as you was used to, but there are some news:
0 - For biggest trash
1 - Big trash, but better than biggest trash
2/Banned, no one even using it
3 - Bad
4/Banned
5 - Average
6 - Good
7/Banned, a lot people abuse it
8/Banned, part of rebalance update
9 - Awesome
10 - Perfect