This thread is permanently archived
Dumb question about ai art
| For what? Those watermarks are piece of trash.
| I thought they do have an invisible watermark though?
| For context I was discussing a way to flag an art made by ai to seperate them
from a human made one on a site that you pay money to look at eg.fanza
>>901955 the keyword here is invisible
>>901955 they do? Guess I'm a dumbass then
| That's actually a good question. Invisible though, like in the metadata?
| How hard is it to remove that? Let's say every image generate by stable diffusion AI has a metadata mark in them. Can you just not upscale or downscale it to remove it? Or just take a screenshot of the AI art.
| >>902078 it isn't a metadata element, it's in the actual image. similar to https://github.com/desudesutalk/desudesutalk
| Metadata is piss easy to remove
| responsibilityyy, and bad luck
| I think most people just use it for fun and make porn. Sure, it would be uncalled for if someone turns normal pics into blacked/bleached/NTR/Scat/Gore, but they can already do it before AI by using image editing software, it's just that they can do it with less effort now. So, it's not really a nrw problen caused by AI.
The only thing that need to be stopped is assholes who copy others sketch, finish it using AI, and claim the original artist copied them.
| >>902408 Not really even less effort using AI, there's no real datasets for that so they'd have to collect one and train the AI, and that's more work than just using GNU IMP or Photoshop
This thread is permanently archived
| Why didn't they have invisible watermark?