Post number #840734, ID: c7dfe8
|
We like to think of human in small familial units. For example, let's say your sister is giving birth to a child. As a family you're happy for her and happy for the family to grow. However... it's her 4th child! She didn't mean to conceive the child, but as she is family, she is a part of the protagonists in your life and you care about her and her mental health, and being a good friend you gave her your full support.
Post number #840735, ID: c7dfe8
|
Now if human is a fully empathetic creature, we will understand everyone's circumstances and give as much lenience as we did to our hypothetical sister. Except this is creates a paradox: if we were to sympathize with everyone who had unplanned pregnancy, then we will have too many children, which results to less resource available to raise our own. Therefore full empathy ends up harming our own, not good.
Post number #840736, ID: c7dfe8
|
As a compromise we decide to come up with the labels of evil, stamp it on people who scores low in our desireability ranking. Then we continue to propagate, leaving these people to die for our "story" to continue. It's just how the world works. After all, the alternative is Order. And the thought of having to tell the government how many children you want just triggers a lot of you reading this. We're just animals playing the prisoner's dilemma infinite amount of times.
Post number #840739, ID: 47f111
|
k
Post number #840773, ID: ea95fc
|
I like reading these stuff. Keep going OP.
Total number of posts: 5,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1647156084
| We like to think of human in small familial units. For example, let's say your sister is giving birth to a child. As a family you're happy for her and happy for the family to grow. However... it's her 4th child! She didn't mean to conceive the child, but as she is family, she is a part of the protagonists in your life and you care about her and her mental health, and being a good friend you gave her your full support.