This thread is permanently archived
pretending not to understand the monty hall problem just to
| I used to know a guy like this.
He doesn't have any friends anymore.
| But steeul iz hehvier din feathas
| what is a monty hall problem
| >>828521
ngl this is something I would argue based on the fact that due to steel's density it will necessarily fall faster then feathers, which will have more air resistance.
Obviously if both items are of comparable density (say steel shavings as oppoaed to ingots) the drag would be similar.
Philosophy 101 dicks have more leeway there than with the whole 1/3-2/3 of monty hall haha
| After a certain age this kind of behaviour becomes downright sad.
| >>828603
maybe so, but anyone still falling for this and not writing OP off as a faggot is perhaps even more immature.
| yall are proving my point lol
normal people would just sigh and say "okay (you clearly dont get it)" but for some reason you nerds get so pissy Ls all around
| Do you understand that pretending to be retarded makes you retarded?
| >>828762
no i understand that pretending to misunderstand a thought problem seems to seriously piss people off when it doesnt affect literally anything and apparently pisses weird randos online enough to call someone the r slur over it but its cool haha you guys are very clearly More Mature And Wouldnt Engage In Tomfoolery. Very Cool !!
| https://i.imgur.com/STqRcoK.jpeg
| write me a dissertation on the 100 door monty hall problem nerd :))
| idk man this was just a joke thread and yall are like "mm i am too cultured to EVER play the fool". Its...not that serious
the monty hall problem is counter intuitive by nature and tbh the people that are condwacending about it are way more annoying than the layperson that doesnt get it (or obstinately pretends not to)
didnt realise you all knew the same person who did the same thing to you my baddddd
| >>828536
It's not about speed of descent, it's about weight. Or, to put it the way the original bit did;
Which is heavier, a kilogram of steel, or a kilogram of feathers?
| >>828840
I get that weight is proportional to gravity but my moobshining would be whether the two i stances would achieve the same rate of falling based on differing compositions.
a parachute unfurled falls way slower than the same parachute bundled up, is my logic i guess
| >>829012
Once again, weight=/= density. Weight is propirtuinal to gravity. Obv two things of the same weight weigh the same and should be affected by gravity the same in a vacuum-but earth isnt a vacuum, there is air resistance etc. Thats my only point in saying that question is more open to interpretation. Would you disagree?
| >>829012
Or to answer your question with a question: what falls faster, a folded parachute or one in full deployment? :)
| >>829046
pretending not to understand questions just to piss off the gurl pretending not to unserstand the monty hall problem :))))))
| Which is heavier, a kilogram of folded parachutes, or a kilogram of falling of deployed parachutes?
| >>829134
...is this the solution?
They both weigh the same, but fall at different speeds because of air friction.
| On an atmosphereless planet, they'd fall at the same speed.
This thread is permanently archived
| just to piss nerds off lmfao they get so mad about it