danger/u/
This thread is permanently archived
i feel like i can't be a good person anymore

| everything i do feels twisted and it constantly feels like im losing my grip of reality and reasoning

what have you guys been doing to stay sane/entertained?


| A lot of video games and sleep


| video games, vtubers, tv, and stuff i enjoy. if you're in an area where you can go hiking or enjoy nature i'd suggest that too.

try doing some exercise everyday to keep yourself in shape, so when you come out of quarantine you'll look good and feel good.


| also see a therapist, losing your grip of reality and reasoning isn't fun


| yeah, >>de07b5 got it right. get a therapist. I know it's super cliche, but it's actually one of the most helpful things you can do.


| Entertained? Too much porn. Sane? Making myself feel disgusting afterwards at all the terrible things that turn me on. It's literally months selffuckfest interspersed with short periods of more-and-more immense selfdisgust. And recently I found the darkweb and childporn, which is both the most arousing and afterwards most disgusting thing ever. I think I need help. Or maybe it's like the Vietnam war junkies who just quit when society resumed for them.


| >>698616 stop jacking off to cp and report yourself to police you horny motherfucker. also burn your computer and never touch the internet again


| >>698616 Whoa that is definetly not the best thing to do. You probably should ask someone close to you for help or something, or at least go to a therapist. Such things can make you even a worse person if you wont stop, so i hope you will have a better day!


| Haha. You mean childfucker!
>report yourself to police
Don't do this. It won't help anyone. If you need professional help, also be careful, because psychiatrists have to keep records, which can be dangerous especially for paedophiles. There's some anonymous psychiatric help for paedophiles on the darkweb, but I've never needed it.


| >burn your computer
Figuratively. It's dangerous to keep on your computer, so you have to be diligent about encryption, wiping memory.


| >Such things can make you even a worse person if you wont stop
So can all sorts of other things. My paedophilia doesn't affect the rest of my life, I don't hurt anyone. In this legal climate, there's no accountability for producers, so it's probably rife with abuse. Consuming it increases demand, which increases supply. I get by on innocent media, knowledge of anatomy, and imagination.


| Oh and of course don't rape children. Hang in there.


| *producers of child pornography*
Sorry about the omission.


| >>698616 it sounds like you need way more help than i do


| No matter what you like, it does not necessarily mean you are a bad person.


| I know I'm no bad person, but like with all what's turning me on, I feel disgusting after. Like abduction, rape, drugging, or mental games, and now children. I know it's all terrible things and I'm always disgusting after because. I'm not stupid to I'll try it in real life of course.
>anonymous psychiatric on darkweb
Is it true? I'll look at it.


| First of all, have you tried diverting your attention to non-real cp? Loli porn exists, you know.

Second, don't go to the dark web anymore, especially for someone like you with low self-control.

Third, Dunkelfeld exists, so you can just go to the Troubled Desire site and get help there.


| >Loli porn
That's like comparing layer cake and sheet cake. It's better than nothing, but even the best loli/shota isn't as good as most terrible live-action stuff. There's a certain inimitable quality about children that few adults can capture and portray. There are some exceptions, but they're all stills: no good videos.


| How the fuck do these threads keep getting overtaken by fucking pedophiles spewing their disgusting bullshit? Get a therapist and otherwise keep to yourselves, you fucks. I'm literally sick of this shit.


| >>699505
Don't be confuzed by the poor word choice. I'm sure the subject of this discussion is hebephilia, which is only natural for any living being.


| it's always fucking pedos jfc


| >>699520
>hebephilia, which is only natural for any living being
Like hell it is. You're all just fucked in the head.


| >>699866
Have you ever heard of animals being referred to as "not a baby but still not able to breed yet"? Because there's no such thing. Human females used to marry between 12 and 15 y.o. too, until the late XVI century. Then the age at marriage climbed to an average of 25 due to mass poverty. Church jumped at it making up laws like "no sex until marriage" and "marriage only after 18", and it's the only thing that stops the average marriage age from declining at this point.


| >>699909
Depends on the age of a male, too. If they're both 15, they can bone 24/7 for all I care. If a 30 (hell, even 20) years old guy wants to sleep with a 12 years old girl, he's got problems.
Most of those marriages sure as fuck weren't consensual in any way.
Besides, humans develop way slower than most (if not all) animals. No girl at 12, or even 15, is fully formed. Our fucking brains and, consequentially, psyche only finish developing at around 25.
Stop making up excuses.


| >>699917
Isn't it a hypocricy? What's the difference in sex between 15+15 and 15+30? Oh sure, I forgot to mention the average marriage age for men when talking about Middle Ages. It was 23-27. Everyone was a pedo by todays standards.
You are right that consensual marriages weren't popular until XII century, but even after, nothing age-related has changed until the late XVI century. Humans indeed do develop slower than most animals. Hence, we can breed at age 12, not 2.


| Young girls were forced to marry older men back in the past because of the poverty and 'overpopulation' of their families. Too many children to feed and too little resources to accomplish that. The fact that people used to do that doesn't mean it's normal to continue doing this these days, you're just making silly excuses that don't make much sense


| >>699927
It's exactly the opposite. People weren't that poor in Middle Ages and during the last few centuries of Middle Ages most marriages were consensual. A 13 y.o. girl and a 25 y.o. man were a normal couple to marry back then.
Mass poverty came in the XVI century when the population rose dramatically, at that time the average couple was a 25 y.o. woman and a 27 y.o. man.
Also, marriage was not a cheap method to get rid of a daughter. Google dowry for more info on that.


| >>699922 The problem isn't just a question of whether the teenagers are allowed to have sex themselves. The reason why it's important there's an age limit when people become adults is to say that before this time, people are still in their development phase. Someone way past that getting involved poses a risk that they will manipulate and shape the other in a malicious way. It's why student-teacher relations are so taboo, since they usually spend as much time with kids as parents.


| >>699959
It's actually a good point. But don't all interpersonal relationships (not necessarily sexual or between people of different age) involve manipulation? And is it really the best way to protect someone from being manipulated when you completely deny their right to choose? Imagine if someone said: "I am your president from now on, all elections are prohibited, because if you were to vote, you may be manipulated."


| >>699965
>don't all interpersonal relationships (not necessarily sexual or between people of different age) involve manipulation?
Healthy ones don't.
Kids are really fucking dumb and the choices they make are usually really fucking dumb, too. Granted, that is also true for some adults, but at that point it's only their own problem. Plus, kids are more easily coerced.
Your analogy makes no sense, too, since voting age is a thing and then it all comes back around to the same argument


| >>699993
My analogy wasn't about age, it was about the lack of choice. But actually yes, why aren't children allowed to vote? Most adult voters are manipulated as well, so there shouldn't be any problem.
Then again, why is it that "hebephilia is bad because those people may or may not manipulate children". Isn't it true that politics are even worse because politicians 100% will manipulate hordes of both children and adults?


| >>700000 nice post number, but I now declare you bait

Total number of posts: 32, last modified on: Sun Jan 1 00:00:00 1600879240

This thread is permanently archived