Post number #1091997, ID: 98ff52
|
>Many people confuse dialectics with the doctrine of development: dialectics is in fact such a doctrine. However, it differs substantially from the vulgar "theory of evolution", which is based completely on the principle that neither Nature nor history proceeds in leaps and that all changes in the world take place by degrees. Hegel had already shown that, understood in such a way, the doctrine of development was unsound and ridiculous.
it reads like denierism? can it be?
Total number of posts: 1,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1777395938
| >Many people confuse dialectics with the doctrine of development: dialectics is in fact such a doctrine. However, it differs substantially from the vulgar "theory of evolution", which is based completely on the principle that neither Nature nor history proceeds in leaps and that all changes in the world take place by degrees. Hegel had already shown that, understood in such a way, the doctrine of development was unsound and ridiculous.
it reads like denierism? can it be?