danger/u/
trvth nvkem

| Collective society, upon realizing certain behaviors are socially disruptive and thus shouldn't be allowed. Usage of combative or offensive language disrupts social cohesion, which is usually seen as bad because social cohesion is needed for the society to function normally. This very board is, funnily enough, a perfect example of what happens when this realization/understanding is ignored for years.


| This is the point where you desperately resort to whataboutism about mass immigration, homosexuality, or whatever being allowed despite being disruptive, just to justify yourself calling others niggers and faggots instead of taking personal responsibility.


| trvth nvkem forever


| 50k learned capitalisation. god bless the king


| no this aint 50k they're too coherent


| Conservatives can't stop the march of social progress
The future generations will be queer, cool, cringe, and anti boring "trad values", and they WILL be happy


| Imagine still calling yourself the right when it's revealed to be completely created by Epstein jews in order to push jewish white supremacy while they use their good goys to push Anti DEI and blackrock shit in games.


| >>1090654
>>1090655
trvth nvkem infinite: can't stop nvking


| >>1090654 I mean seeing as they are the only ones having kids it dies out reaaaaaly fast


| >>1090674 just being anti "trad values" doesn't mean you don't get to have sex with women/ have a surrogate etc


| >>1090680
it very well might https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jomf.12723
>have a surrogate
saying you shouldn't reproduce if you can't pony up $50k to rent a womb is very liberal indeed


| >>1090681
specifically, you want to read table 5, but economic status also has to do with it.
then, read this: https://news.gallup.com/poll/646793/why-marriage-became-partisan.aspx
and i'll respect your intelligence moving forward


| >>1090682
>the study is only done on people aged 30-50
>The article shows that 50% of people aged 30-50 who register Democrats got married
>The article shows that 67% of people aged 30-50 who register Republican got married
>The article shows that 49% of people aged 30-50 who register as independent got married
>The article got absolutely no data on how many of these marriages gets children

What even is your point, dude?


| >>1090682
>the study is only done on people aged 30-50
>The article shows that 50% of people aged 30-50 who register Democrats got married
>The article shows that 67% of people aged 30-50 who register Republican got married
>The article shows that 49% of people aged 30-50 who register as independent got married
>The article got absolutely no data on how many of these marriages gets children

What even is your point, dude?

Total number of posts: 14, last modified on: Mon Jan 1 00:00:00 1776473652

Refresh