Post number #1048702, ID: 04046f
|
The requirement for the sustainment of population you will need a female to produce 2.1 child per person in in order to replace the prior producer of 1 male and 1 female.
My proposal is that instead of 1 male 1 female we just simply do 1 male and X number of female. this in theory will lower the requirement of replacement minimum down in a wild margin; Thus increase the population and single handedly solve the lowering population problem.
polygamy gurl was right all along?
Post number #1048703, ID: 547416
|
about child born as male, We tran them.
Post number #1048704, ID: 547416
|
My ID change already? they are onto me! don't let the fed destroy this pl-
Post number #1048709, ID: ebd721>>1048720
|
What if we just become gay?
Post number #1048720, ID: 547416>>1048728
|
>>1048709 what about it?
Post number #1048721, ID: b20e95>>1048745
|
Let's all get OP pregnant!
Post number #1048728, ID: 546be7>>1048734
|
>>1048720 idk!!! It was just a thought!!!
Post number #1048731, ID: f04b77>>1048733>>1048745
|
Everyone shares a father, second generation can only inbreed and humanity becomes genetic swamp freaks
Post number #1048733, ID: 430b07
|
>>1048731 1 male X female doesn't necessarily specify 1 male ONLY, It mean 1M maybe 10F. sry I hit cap limit and forgot to clarify it.
Post number #1048734, ID: 430b07>>1048742
|
>>1048728 why did you thought that!!!! and what about it??!!!
Post number #1048742, ID: 61c2be>>1048744>>1048816
|
>>1048734 b-because I like cute g/u/rls and doing cute (and lewd) things together!! I didn't know there was a population problem! But OP's proposal doesn't make any sense! What makes she think a male can successfully have two females if they usually fail at getting one?
Post number #1048744, ID: 0f8f85
|
I don’t think anyone should have different role reproductively. Everyone should be a hermaphrodite and we should expect both parents to get pregnant and equally share the burdens so no one feels put upon or hurt or targeted by policies to increase birth rates. Everyone can also be a female if we can artificially generate sperm, nor neither if we have artificial wombs. >>1048742 I assume the male is just there to provide the sperm but having people excluded is NOT ok!
Post number #1048745, ID: 0f8f85
|
>>1048721 Yay! Me too I love you all and you op! >>1048731 Inbreeding leads to lack of selection against bad genes, but does not magically cause bad recessive traits to mutate. So long as you’re killing say a quarter of your children who exhibit -/- bad traits you can be healthy and inbred. The thing is a lot of traits are better with +/- heterozygous so you can’t just eliminate the recessive genes. Embryo selection might make this killing more efficient. But important to consider
Post number #1048816, ID: 1ce6d9>>1048887
|
>>1048742 male fail at getting any woman bc they are not as valuable, If we decrease the supply(tran 90% of men at birth) the demand will rise. And it will lower the minimal requirement as I stated in the original post because instead of needing 2.1 for replacement the minimum will instead become 1.1 for 1M 10F, 1.2 for 1M 5F. so what if we just become gay?
Post number #1048853, ID: 4370b4>>1048894
|
What if tranny ethnostate?? Wouldn't that be cute?? I would love to live there!! (But only cute ones will be allowed entry)
Post number #1048887, ID: 37974d>>1048951
|
>>1048816 ur mom is not as valuable
Post number #1048894, ID: 1f3ea8
|
>>1048853 I agree! But only if I remain as a g/u/y-g/u/rl :)
Post number #1048951, ID: 8512c3>>1048954
|
>>1048887 okay tone police. In term of pure reproducibility men are able to impregnate unlimited number of women only limited by his physical endurance and sperm production; on the other hand woman can only get pregnant once every 9 month or so, making women more valuable in the scenario where we talk only about repopulation.
Post number #1048954, ID: 37974d
|
>>1048951 sorry, how long did it took for women to be respected?
Post number #1048955, ID: 0f8f85
|
I guess their valuable as objects but not what they actually can choose to do or not do as much so they don’t get respect historically, like how elephant ivory is valuable but that doesn’t lead to good things from elephants!
Sad topic :< ur valuable | V
Post number #1048979, ID: 595283
|
its simple really, GIVE ME THE HAREM and polygamy gals ans ill save this world singlehandedly
Post number #1048992, ID: 1f3ea8>>1048993>>1049034
|
I think my solution would be this: - Nations worried about their birthrate will make a collective fund to accelerate and make artificial wombs tech a possible, cheap thing. - Once achieved that, each Nation's gov should 1) make a state-funded org with a fully equipped lab and artificial wombs factory. 2) promote private entities to make those by low-interest loans/subsidies/tax cuts. 3) Or do a mix of both. - Then, the state/companies will raise those kids.
You're welcome!
Post number #1048993, ID: 1f3ea8>>1048994
|
>>1048992 also, by making the state/companies directly raise the children, you get rid of the problem that most modern population is affected by, that is not seeing the benefits of raising kids/finding it too burdensome/a too serious matter/too much (social, economic, legal) pressure of raising kids/ etc.
You can call me a genius now.
Post number #1048994, ID: 1faa01>>1049032
|
>>1048993 genius gurl we should meet up and have baby making sex
Post number #1049032, ID: 1f3ea8
|
>>1048994 I think that's a great idea! Huhuhu
Post number #1049034, ID: 0f8f85>>1049036
|
>>1048992 I’ve thought that too but I’m worried about the kids being unwanted and abused like in crucescu’s Romanian orphanages-at some point you need someone to care about the kiddos.
Include me in the baby making sex!
Post number #1049036, ID: 1f3ea8>>1049080
|
>>1049034 you can join the baby making!
And yeah, that'd be certainly an issue, but if you disregard it in order to "solve the population crisis" as the birthrate is a growing problem that's increasing in being prioritized, then you can consider my solution as effective to adress that problem.
Of course, after that, the new problem would be: "how to raise children properly for the good of themselves, for their society and for their nation?"
But we'll see what we do, I guess..
Post number #1049080, ID: df89d3>>1049091
|
>>1049036 I think one idea would be to give children lots of independence and dogs which love them for the whole love aspect and let them have their own homes and choose between regulated corporations to raise them like how people choose between Businesses. I really hope we make it happen! I want to work for one and make lotsa happy empowered kiddos and have my own good genes in the artificial wombs and ofc not my bad ones. I’m hoping we can do it on a small scale irl
Post number #1049091, ID: 1f3ea8>>1049162
|
>>1049080 you're so mega based g/u/rl I would love to make babies with you I hope it happens as we envision it!
Post number #1049162, ID: 0f8f85>>1049177
|
>>1049091 I’m part a group which hopes to achieve it, but unfortunately we aren’t placed in the industries, are mostly students, and also desire an equal nonbinary humanity, as well as eventually neural sharing of feelings and knowledge, which you may dislike. If you’re interested in helping promote these ideals, and hopefully our eventual development programs, I’d be happy to invite you to our discord or telegram! Otherwise, keep it up cutie!!
Post number #1049177, ID: 1f3ea8>>1049184
|
>>1049162 a nonbinary humanity? As in... Removing gender pressure/gender expectations/gender roles? Or as creating (or forcing?) non-aging androgynous nonbinary humans?
I don't use discord or telegram or chat sites but thanks you for the offer
Post number #1049184, ID: 0f8f85>>1049190
|
>>1049177 The second to reliably achieve the first. Aging will likely be a long time off, same as the neutral stuff.
Very polite thank you g/u/rl! I didn’t want to be pushy.
Post number #1049190, ID: 1f3ea8
|
>>1049184 I think understand the idea, probably hmm could be a interesting way to achieve a great degree of equality and understanding
But.. I personally wouldn't be so willing to erase completely that part of human nature that divides us into male or female, I believe masc people can coexist peacefully with the fem people, anything in between and/or no gender at all too. I think it makes things more colorful and diverse! We just need to be kinder! A kinder society! in my opinion
Post number #1049240, ID: 362684>>1049326>>1049342
|
It's funny, yesterday i had subject about social darwinism (and is "solving" population problems too) but by different way as is meaned this post xd
Post number #1049342, ID: 0f8f85>>1049352
|
>>1049240 I’m really glad you’re learning things :)
Post number #1049352, ID: 362684
|
>>1049326 why? xdd >>1049342 basically science what bringed nazi germany and lobotomy xd or interpretation of colonialism
It is somehow funny but controversial
Total number of posts: 38,
last modified on:
Fri Mar 21 2025 17:21:44 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
| The requirement for the sustainment of population you will need a female to produce 2.1 child per person in in order to replace the prior producer of 1 male and 1 female.
My proposal is that instead of 1 male 1 female we just simply do 1 male and X number of female. this in theory will lower the requirement of replacement minimum down in a wild margin; Thus increase the population and single handedly solve the lowering population problem.
polygamy gurl was right all along?