Post number #744433, ID: d7ba35
|
The idea that politics/economy/democracy should be p2p instead of communist/capitalist. It's a rare idea, so I'm wondering what other people's thoughts on it would be ?
Post number #744459, ID: 697036
|
wut?
Are you refering to peer 2 peer? Like in, 2 people exchaning political ideas to eachother without no one else knowing about it?
Post number #744479, ID: b03009
|
Hmm please explain more about it, Im interested to hear about how it would work
Post number #744485, ID: 697036
|
>>744479 Midia-kun
Post number #744516, ID: b03009
|
>>744509 what and why? All Im doing is asking for more info on the topic and you are deraling the thread
Post number #744518, ID: 697036
|
>>744516 I already did that. You really just said nothing with your first post. Please stop that.
Post number #744526, ID: b03009
|
>>744518 are you serious? You that You can mark threads by just typing on them right? I wanna see the thread, Im using the site the same way you are but Im somehow infringing on your "space" and destroying the thread? Just chill dude, this is getting dumber each thread.
Post number #744527, ID: b03009
|
Like you are acting like the kid who has a beef with someone and goes "stop copying me!!" In the line to use the bathroom
Post number #744537, ID: d7ba35
|
>>744459 yes, I was referring to peer to peer >>744479 it's a niche idea - https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/peertopeer-p2p-economy.asp and https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net describe it well. it's more common in post-leftist circles.
Post number #744543, ID: b03009
|
>>744537 thank you for the source. Well its funny how the article tries to present p2p as a not traditional capitalistic means of production, its just what capitlism was before industrial revolution and feuds.
P2p is good but I wonder how many industries could work on it, some online content creators have their own sites to have more freedom, uber is a cool.
But I dont see p2p carrying economy, politics and democracy, but it would be cool if it grew a bit more
Post number #744544, ID: b03009
|
It gives people more freedom and is the very much a type of free market
Post number #744547, ID: 697036
|
>>744537 Wow, I'm gonna have to read up on that and get back to you.
Post number #744603, ID: a8a8aa
|
>>744537 p2p? Pff, what about make from nihilism political ideology?
Post number #744668, ID: d7ba35
|
>>744603 there are already political ideologies based on nihilism
Post number #744782, ID: 15345f
|
P2P? Peepee to peepee? I dont know man, sounds kinda gay to me.
Post number #744924, ID: 29d56d
|
This gurl wants to give control of the econony to those who monopolize homosexuality, traps!
Post number #745062, ID: 2bda08
|
>>744924 there are no problems with this plan
Post number #745439, ID: 3f7b65
|
Not really a new or even alternative idea. It exists both in capitalist and communist discourse, either as "disruptive capitalism" or "kybernetic communism". The only special thing about this idea is that it doesn't only exist under the umbrella of capitalism like most other ide(a|ologie)s. Don't believe you'll re-invent the wheel.
Total number of posts: 20,
last modified on:
Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1615719576
| The idea that politics/economy/democracy should be p2p instead of communist/capitalist. It's a rare idea, so I'm wondering what other people's thoughts on it would be ?