Post number #664051, ID: 2498ce
|
Idk, that statement was intentionally vague.
Is something missing from that post? The post it was responding to? Are they missing some kind of context?
Post number #664052, ID: 64f4d9
|
>>664051 i have answered
Post number #664065, ID: a2aa02
|
>>64f4d9 is missing something alright
Post number #664066, ID: 01135d
|
>>663885 no actually it leads to huge leaps in scientific development.
Post number #664068, ID: 2498ce
|
>>664065 I think he just doesn't have a point
Post number #664106, ID: 840a16
|
>>664066 investment in it leads to scientific development. We could invest cold war era funding in faster nukes and lasers for ships in an arms race and maybe gain some side benefits for people, while provoking an arms race, or we could invest in something more useful and get side benefits plus green energy or better health or something
Post number #664164, ID: d8ba3e
|
Another cold war with who? Itself? America looks like it's barely holding together
Post number #664239, ID: 2498ce
|
>>664164 Maybe OP meant civil war? Still pretty ridiculous, but more plausible I guess.
Total number of posts: 16,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1590937803
| It only leads to slower Scientific development and make more poor people in both countries