danger/u/
This thread is permanently archived
Is the 3rd world war is about to start

| just leave a comment


| Looking at the current geopolitics, YES.. but the war will take place using economical and financial terms


| War by instigated famine


| >>522196
So the global arms race is just for entertainment?


| >>522254
I would say that financial and economical terms are driving force for global arms race. The more economical and financial better off you are, greater is your influence. Arms, energy etc are just means for greater gains.
One of the things to watch out this ywar ia growth of nationalism and balkanisation of technology among various countries


| Balkanization of technology? What? Do you mean balkanization of technology companies or something else?


| It will happen

Because I read too much science fiction
Think about the post-apocalyptic existence.(Of course not XXXXX 76 )

I remember last time Hawaii, USA was hit by a fake nuclear bomb
Although it's only a Realistic exercise

In case the alarm goes off as false to the system of nuclear retaliation

I don't know which Asian country became Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

May world peace prevail


| it's always about to start


| Yes


| I'd say if there will be a ware it will not become ww3.
ww1 showed people the horrors of war and ww2 nailed them with extra help from fashits.
I don't think there will be any global conflicts that will be solved with guns. Also i believe that any aggressor will be eliminated by any means and by everyone. It will be all vs one.
Maybe when an ideology other than capitalism becomes popular.
Do you want a ww3?


| WW3 is already in progress. It's the global war of the rich against the poor.
Either this leads to a proletarian revolution, dethroning the bourgeoisie and breaking the chains of capitalism.
Or the bourgeoisie's effort on revitalizing religious fundamentalism, nationalism and even racism will stop this kind of revolution for the 3rd time in history. Then humanity is for sure a lost case. Judging on current peoples class consciousness, things looks pretty bad right now.


| This isn't news.


| Maybe John Titors predictions are coming true but got delayed due to terminator 3 rules.


| Hopefully.


| >>523076 >>522848
People in various countries are starting to see that you can't rely on global trade for essential products, be it food,energy, etc.
And because it leaves many of the service based economies of the world pretty vulnerable.

Capitalism is the driving force in this ideological change, the freedom it gives the people to rely on themselves instead of others is what is making people more nationalist.


| >>523076 >>522848
Genetic groups have an evolutionary incentive to remain close, and wanting to be left alone, the technological changes of today have allowed people from all over the world to live on environments they are not fit for, and making the lives of native populations worse of.


| >>523076 >>522848
The clearest examples of this are the South African white population and Anglo-Saxon people in Australia.
Being the later the later the capital of skin cancer in the world, along with NZ
https://www.specialistaustralia.com.au/why-is-the-skin-cancer-rate-higher-in-australia/

All this while having almost eradicated the protagonism of the culture of the native genetic population.


| >>523434
>Genetic groups
How do you distinguish this "genetic groups" among humans? Did you ever notice that all humans are genetically compatible to each other and mixed up their genes the whole time?
>the technological changes of today have allowed people from all over the world to live on environments they are not fit for
This is not new and absolutely not connected to "genetic groups". Technological advance is a challenge that any kind of people struggle with.


| >>523435
>The clearest examples of this are the South African white population and Anglo-Saxon people in Australia.
They are only an example for how white trash from europe could oppress other people, just because they had the technology for it. It's an example of irresponsible and selfish asshole behavior thanks to technological supremacy. It's seldom the same kind of people that developed this technology. They are the descendants of primitive and brute criminals.


| >>523447
By Environment of course, the grizzly bear is compatible for reproduction with the Polar bear, but their patterns of behavior are very different because of the environment where they evolved. Polar bears raise a cub as a couple.
While Grizzly and other species are raised by single mothers.
And if they were to have mixed cubs these are not fit for neither of the environments their parents were completely adapted. And quickly disappear.


| >>523447
Technology today is a very fragile thing, there are so many systems that depend on others that even just an economic crash can make most of the basic complementary products that allow different population to thrive in other geological locations unavailable. As sun block for the Australian and NZ populations. And without international travel this populations would be trapped on an environment that will decimate them via skin and health problems.


| >>523448
Here you are not pointing anything rational about my argument, you are just saying no it's not, it is only this, without providing any information in how my assertions about the wreck that immigration from your home environment to the one of others is.


| >>523448
As i pointed out today's Oceanic population is very vulnerable to the environment they live in.While having no part in the horrors their ancestors may have committed, as many of them immigrated many years after these occurred. They continue to live in an environment that will eventually kill them off, and will allow native genetic populations to flourish. And this will happen all around the globe unless the production of critical products could be guaranteed anycrashproof.


| >>523463
>By Environment of course, the grizzly bear is compatible for reproduction with the Polar bear, but their patterns of behavior are very different because of the environment where they evolved.
But other than humans grizzly and polar bears don't cross the oceans with ships or the air by planes. And other than humans bears can't write down information and spread it around the world via a cable. Humans can do that, no matter from where they originally come.


| >>523468
>They continue to live in an environment that will eventually kill them off, and will allow native genetic populations to flourish.
Native oceanic populations will drown because global warming proceeds and the polar ice is melting down. They will flee to geographically higher regions.
Also white, black and native people already have are mixed their gene pool - and this is a good thing, because: Recombination is an important and underrated evolution factor.


|
>>523480
Humans can do that as of now, and we have enough differences between races to be different species, as each race has developed in different environments, where different capacities where needed and selected for. Humans having greater intellectual capacities than bears does not mean that the differences do not scale with it, and physical differences remain a great factor for survival in different environments.
We are different and that is the key of the diversityofmankind


| >>523480
We will not go extinct, because there are humans in all kinds of different environments. What makes more likely our survival, and the population that
remain will take the torch of humanity.

>>523481
1.It's a tragedy for all of humanity, as they are a backup, the same as anyone else. It a loss nonetheless.

>Mixing is a good thing, because recombination is important and underrated.

2.1 Explain please as it is not a argument until you explain why.
I'll explain why not





|

>>523481
2.2 Mixing dilutes the specialization of the genetic characteristics of a population, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grizzly%E2%80%93polar_bear_hybrid,
The world has many environments very different even when close (SouthAmerica Andes make radical changes to geography and as a result there are very distinctive populations between tropical and snowcappedclose regions all while being very close on a global scale).




|

>>523481
2.2 As the pizzly bear who is unfit for both of his ancestors environments. The same happens with humans skin color, being that half black and half white or asian humans don't conserve their black color, this dilutes to become a lighter shade of black, even becoming a dark shade of brown, which will be less protective against solar radiation, thus less fit for a life in africa.


|

>>523481
2.2 And this mixing will also darken the skin of the child from a white or asian parent mixing with a black individual, which will carry very negative consequences if he were to stay in the environment of his white ancestors. https://www.naturalnews.com/036181_blacks_vitamin_D_deficiency_cancer.html#

We exist in world which has changed really fast thanks to us, but we are not biologically prepared for the possibilities this opens for us.


| >>523483
>2.1 Explain please as it is not a argument until you explain why.
Do you understand the concept of "degeneration"? It happens if a population stays homogenous for too long.
Do you know where the word "missionary" comes from? It's because native south-american tribes knew that their populations need "fresh new genes". They even fight each other to steal other tribes women. When spanish/portuguese missionaries arrived, they were welcomed to impregnate the native women.


| >>523487
>We exist in world which has changed really fast thanks to us, but we are not biologically prepared for the possibilities this opens for us.
I agree on that, but I would never link it to pseudo-science-based and outdated race theories and/or wrong perception of ethnology. I already demonstrated you the differences between bears and humans, and you still persist on this ridiculous "example".


| >>523489
1)Degeneration occurs if there isn't enough mutation on the genes of a population, which is resolved via reproductive means(as long as there is a vast numbers of births mutation will occur at an enough rate to solve this problem, that is why having a male and a female has been an effective way of reproducing while mutating the gen pool.

2)http://www.answers.com/Q/The_root_of_the_words_missionary_and_missile

They both derive from the Latin "mittere" meaning "to send".




| >>523483
>We will not go extinct, because there are humans in all kinds of different environments. What makes more likely our survival, and the population that
remain will take the torch of humanity.
I don't think that "different" environments are the problem for people.
The typical asian eye shape is strongly suspected for originally being an adaption to snowy landscapes (protection from reflection). And still asians managed to populate desert regions and the jungle.


| >>523491
We are both mammals(bears and humans), show me how characteristics such as skin color do not change if persons of different skin color mix, as i have explained and backed up how it affects the relation between populations and environment, and even more so to immigrant populations who no adaptation to the environment they are migrating to.


| >>523492
>Degeneration occurs if there isn't enough mutation on the genes of a population
AND RECOMBINATION. Yes mutation is a factor too, but also recombination.
>which is resolved via reproductive means(as long as there is a vast numbers of births mutation will occur at an enough rate to solve this problem, that is why having a male and a female has been an effective way of reproducing while mutating the gen pool.
This describes rather recombination than mutation properties.


| >>523493
Populations mixing in an organic and successful way is something that takes many centuries at the least and happens in very close geographical areas and was regulated by the environments in which it happened, but that's not the case today. as we depend on technology to survive, even more so mixed humans.


| >>523495
The Human genetic code mutates every so often when a child is born, that's how it spread and specialized to different environments originally, theorized as the original human population being less than 3000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toba_catastrophe_theory#Genetic_bottleneck_theory

In a case like that of the Toba catastrophe is the mutation that happens when a human is born what originally gave and is still giving us our genetic diversity, even in homogeneous groups.


| >today
Your time-conciousness seems to be a bit outdated. People already traveled around the world for thousand years.
(Biological) evolution btw. is a process that rather occurs in millions of years scale than thousands of years or centuries.
Last but not least, your whole theory is already unmasked as mistake by reality. Because there are black, white, asian, mixed, etc. people all over the world that don't struggle that much with the geographical/climatic environment.


| >>523503
>Because there are black, white, asian, mixed, etc. people all over the world that don't struggle that much with the geographical/climatic environment.
But there is another struggle going on, which is much more important and relevant for all people than your "skin-color-vitamin-d-flaw". It's the pure economical struggle between the poor and the rich. And this is what this tread originally was about, not some social-darwinist mumbo-jumbo.


| >>523503
Not in boat, definitely not transatlantic in the scale of today, and yes mixed people exist in environments that allow that and so they become native and fit,(The time i wrote is how much time it will take to mix a two different genetic populations) but in no way the same as people are mixing in the giant metropolis of the world.


| >>523503
My "theory" does not says there won't be mixing of genes but that it would only work on specific environments, that would allow for that, what i state is that evolution and mixing will be successful based on the relation between the genes and the environment.


| >>523504
This mumbo jumbo is the basis for how our societies are today, the class struggle you see today is also part of that as the ruling class see us as averages market trendings and so on, the same for political leanings, the values of the republican party something that republicans have a right to defend in legal ways, are threatened because the central american populations are significantly more pro big government, which is being exploited by people with opposite values.


| >>523504
If there where people that would not care if violence was used to eliminate "undesirables"(something that they get to decide) and would vote to make the leader that pleases them a king like figure, their illegal immigration with government inaction in face of it. Would radically change the population that gets to vote as time goes on.
Thus looking to replace the voting base that will decide the future of the nation. All in the search for power.


| does this mean i can live in a fallout esque universe finally?
Or Would it be more similar to S.T.A.L.K.E.R?


| >>523514
Hello player. You are in the MUNDANE TIMELINE so expect neither.

Total number of posts: 46, last modified on: Wed Jan 1 00:00:00 1548200831

This thread is permanently archived