danger/u/
MASA - Make America Small Again

| If Trump wants to "make America great", why hes destroying everything that made it "great" in the first place? Now hes fucking around with the defence alliance NATO, because some european countries didn't fully join his international law violating operation epstein fury.
As if the US did not benefit from the NATO most of the time. Without the NATO the US may loose some of their most important military outposts in Europe.


| What’s wrong with being small? I am 5’6”


| he wants to downsize it to the size of epstein island and declare himself god-emperor before he dies


| >esl politics thread
yup, it's the indians again


| >>1089326
Get down on your knees and simp for Trump some more, whydontcha.


| The military outposts in Europe that only really serve to protect Europe from Russia...

The thing you fail to see is how much the US carries NATO, logistically speaking, the only thing US benefits in is territory and maybe intel, but then they have to provide weaponry, protection, manpower, diplomats, all to a degree that compensates for what the EU countries are lacking.

EU unfortunately needs the US more, so its good leverage.


| In Trumps narcissistic mind, he just got into a war, carried the whole thing out by himself and non of his allies cam to help, so it stands to reason he is pondering leaving NATO.


| >>1089327
not me, beta. you take a flight to faizabad and go to the 3rd floor of the royal enfield service center and ask for john. you'll get paid much more than for this shameful job.


| >>1089331
bold of you to assume that he knows why he got into a war (netanyahu told him, he can't think for himself and his brain is mush: the zog is real)


| >>144503
America has been against European rearmament since WW2. It's by design and the US has benefitted greatly from it, as the entire EU is propping up their arms industry. Since Trump demanded rearmament AND soured relationships, the EU won't prop up the US war machine any more. It's generally bad for everyone involved, but more so the US.


| If euroniggers and Indiana larping as a better race can comment on our politics then I get to be a racist as I want. We are both showing how ignorant we are


| >>1089342
Think about it from a logistial stand point tho, what would happen faster? EU rearming itself to US lvls (building factories, militarizing population, development of technology), or some already armed country with historical beef starting a war while they are defenseless.

The circumstances you raised were from post WW2 and cold war, in the current status quo, the US basically has no enemies that match them in sheer power (economy and rep are other factors).


| The US really has leverage ver Nato as the strongest country in the alliance, the reality is that the reasons WHY the US is the strongest there dont matter in the face of the reality that without the US, NATO is practically defenseless for at least a decade...

And it would be bad for the US to leave them due to loss of allies and US history of violence, but this is more so an emotional appeal than a rational one since the leverage point is in the US not the EU.


| Because the rational appeal is quite simple, if the US were to leave NATO right now, who would be at its most vulnerable?

EU obviously... Sucks but its the reality of the situation, we can't do much about it.


| shit's fucked, everyone deserves a good nuking to level the playing field. literally.

Total number of posts: 15, last modified on: Mon Jan 1 00:00:00 1775766317

Refresh