danger/u/
Parasites are the most common form of life on Earth. Scientists believe that over 80% of all living things are parasites.

| Modern parasitologists recognize that they have not found all human parasites. They estimate that hundreds if not thousands of human parasites will be found in the coming years.


| The most deadly human parasites besides top-ranking corporate executives are protozoa, which are single-celled organisms. Some of these tiny creatures (there are over 80,000) have brought humans more misery and death than anything else in history(again, besides CEOs), including wars and famine. The most well known deadly parasitic protozoa is plasmodium, which causes malaria.


| Parasites are separated into four main groups: 1) protozoa, which are tiny, one-celled organisms; 2) helminths, or worm parasites, such as tapeworms and pinworms; 3) arthropods, which aren’t parasites themselves, but these insects and spiders are common hosts of parasitic diseases; and 4) top-ranking corporate executives.


| Most parasitic infections happen in warm climates or capitalistic societies, such as tropic or subtropic regions or the US healthcare system.


| The top four parasitic infections in the U.S. are 1) trichomoniasis, a sexually transmitted disease caused by the protozoan trichomoniasis vaginalis, with about 7.4 million cases annually; 2) Giardia, a protozoan that causes intestinal problems, with about 2 million infections annually; 3) cryptosporidium, a protozoan infection with about 300,000 infections per year; and 4) US insurance company CEOs, which is the deadliest on the list.


| There are three kinds of human parasites: endoparasites, which cause infection inside the body, ectoparasites, which cause infection outside the body on the skin, and the insurance company CEOs, which kills 5.113 people every hour according to a harvard study.


| I feel queasy : ( I don’t think I should’ve been a toilet for diarrhea Chan or bought that Amazon stock after all : (


| a human parasite wrote this thread


| Just like me fr fr


| >>1034904 based


| Do you really need scientists to tell you that?
Insects eat each other
Birds eat insects
Cats eat birds
Cows eat grass
You drink milk
You eat beef
Plants spread their roots and take each other out.
Your cocksleeve chugs down your cum.


| >>1035202
None of those are parasites? Maybe you should listen more to science and less to yourself, lol.


| Strange but internet algorithms since yesterday have been telling me like crazy about parasites, on YT, on the internet - even on Dangeru i see it. WTF?


| And you know, almost 50% of info i see is about how to cure it... By using the method/recipe of Chinggis Khan - eat 200 grams of garlic (finely chopped but no juice) by night, eat it with sauerkraut, do an enema after a day and then a month to restore microflora with the help of fermented milk products(Kefir,Kumis,Yogurt no sugar)

Will garlic go up in price???

P.S The recipe is very danger for Heart/GI TRACT/kidneys if doing it wrong, so "Do Your Own Research" anon.


| >>56987c
Parasites are going viral because they removed a big one in Manhattan a few days ago.


| >>1035202
You're fucking retarded


| And they all got blue hair HEYYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


| luigi confirmed danger/u/ g/u/rlie


| >>1035283 local ableist confirmed annoying


| >>1035364 its not 2016


| >>1035726
No, that was a really retarded post that he responded to. The moron tried to mansplain science despite being retardedly uneducated about the topic.

Uneducated people should leave... or kill themselves by ignoring warning labels.


| >>1035729 local ableist confirmed annoying and a fascist


| >>1035726 AbLeIsT unemployed behavior

>>1035727 yeah it's 2024 and yall have gotten even worse

>>1035729 mansplain. You fit your own description kill yourself



| >>1035799 when was it unemployed behavior to be angry when people treat my friends with severe disrespect gurl


| the r slur is a slur because it really fucks with people's heads when you say that shit, it ain't funny


| y'all need to grow one, and by grow one i mean a heart


| >>1035801 it actually is pretty fucking funny, and no I wouldn't call someone with mental retardation retarded. I call people people who act retarded online retarded. To that end stop being retarded plz and thx


| >>1035807 kys <3


| Please please don't be mean. We're supposed to help each other and make things better.

My position on retard is it's good to say among friends 'that seems a lil retarded buddies' or 'uh oh retard alert' when talking about like really bad policies, but it also gets used as a cruel weapon of exclusion.

If we can't say it, we can't criticize the stupid.

If we do say it, things become not cute, not nice, and we don't feel in love with each other.


| >>1035813 "we can't criticize the stupid" other words exist and you just used them lmaooooooooo


| My friend who does a good job standing up for trans people said I can't use retard, but I still say it with friends not her, and I don't feel like I can trust her because I feel like she might at any time decide I'm a bad person.

I feel bad about that, but I don't feel like if we can't say retarded we can't really emotionally denounce stupid things, and that's really important.

But it gets used so much in toxic ways.I hope you have a more clear view of the issue.


| >>1035814
The way you use lmaoooo is I think worse than if you's said
""we can't criticize the stupid" other words exist and you just used them lil retarded maybe ; ) "

You see why I think that? because like lmaooo is like 'you are a joke I disregard you.' but like idk I feel like we can accept having a little bit of a retarded part of ourselves.

But notice why I said emotional. Yeah you can say 'stupid' but when some stupidity is really persistent and harmful stupid sounds weak


| But I think replying with 'retard' or 'faggot' too is really bad because it creates a conversation of 'you are in bad group we're gonna fight' and not 'x tendency is bad and we can fix it together'

But of course the solution can't just be to 'just don't criticize the person' because you could become like an isis person by always killing people for 'being infidel' instead of 'being infidels.'


| ur not a bad person but you really need to think about why she wouldn't trust you or think you're a good person if you're doing casual ableism around your friends. it's the same as how "locker room talk" normalizes sexual assault


| I'm not saying don't criticize people lmao


| Like retard is useful in fighting against religions and cults when they trick people, because religion people keep making the same mistakes over and over again and we need to really be upset by that so we can escape it! I think maybe the bigger issue is how do we become an enabling culture without being disgusted by the disabled. Because that's what it really is. Like retard makes me feel disgusted and avoid the thing, and that's helped me avoid mistakes but it makes me cruel them


| like im criticizing u right now gurl im just not calling you the r slur


| >>1035820 like im glad ur doing that but still


| >>1035821
I appreciate it <3 but you could call my thoughts a lil retarded if you emphasized I wasn't overall and could still learn.

OK what if the dynamic is whether a criticism implies incapability to change for the better?

Like if you called me a loser or buffoon I those both say my nature is that, so I can't get better, but I think it's good to see that some patterns of behavior cause loser/buffoon results.

This isn't addressing the 'how do we like disabled people problem'


| >>1035823
But I might be talking about 2 separate issues here contributing to complex issues we see. Those being:

How to be disgusted by a thing and not exasperated from people.

How to criticize well

How to have good morals overall

And probably more


| Like let's take the example of crypto. saying
'crypto is retarded because people lose money again and again giving it to the crypto people'

I think kinda sends the message

'be disgusted at repeated mistakes! Repeated mistakes are crypto!
be disgusted by crypto!'

Saying "on average crypto people lose money" would be a bad way to do it, because there's no the emotional drive.

You could say "crypto are evil thieves" instead of retard but I think that's worse


| >>1035823 no, the deal is that when you call someone else the r slur you're by definition saying that they are disabled and by saying it when someone's doing something bad you then imply that people who do bad things are disabled, or being "disabled about it"

part of it is about courtesy, but what ur also doing is internalizing that when you do a bad thing it's *like you're disabled*, and then you revulse at that because you think, "i don't want to be disabled!"


| because it sends the message there are just 'bad guys' instead of like mental processes to avoid.

But I confess I wouldn't feel nice or like I have friends saying the first crypto thing because I feel like I'm holding myself above other people and will abuse them for my own pleasure


| even if you genuinely mean well and are a good person


| >>1bda07 a disability is something that makes it difficult or impossible to constructively function in human society
it is harmful for normal people to be around people with mental illnesses. people with mental illnesses cause harm to normal people
people with physical illnesses tend not to be harmful, but still fail to be productive (mobility/labor value).


| your feelings will not change the fact that some people are born wrong. your liberal bullshit is why they continue to be born wrong. this is fixable using eugenics/gene editing. instead, they continue to suffer, we continue suffer, and you post shit like this, which makes me suffer indignation personally


| >>1035826
"by saying it when someone's doing something bad you then imply that people who do bad things are disabled, or being "disabled about it""

Very much so. I agree that's what I'm doing, But isn't that necessary?
Good actions comes from good thinking right? So we DO need to identify the bad thinking which results in bad results as the cause of problems, and really feel that bad thinking is bad.


| >>1035831 you can also say that something's bad or harmful just by... saying it? at no point have i called you the r slur but you still feel like you really need to defend yourself, because you kind of lowkey understand that you're being called out


| >>1035829 go away lmao. i bet you jack off to nick fuentes


| >>1035830
I do really want eugenics for everyone and that's what scares me about using 'woke language' is like we stop seeing fundamental flaws in people, but I think every explicit eugenics movements ends up nasty because ultimately people with problems get othered. And so eugenics movements don't attract the best because the kindest people are disgusted by that.

We need a way to have both. To feel cared about and make everyone like the best people. And that starts in thoughts


| >>1035834 if you ever get to have sex with your wife and think of having children with her, you'll realize it's econonmics and material science that are the underpinning of this world, not whatever flavor tumblrism with 1312 characteristics is popular this week


| >>1035835 you want EUGENICS


| >>1035833
Well it's more because people I care about say the things you say and I feel like the 'antiwoke' view is cruel and leading nowhere, but I see your view as the 'twitter' view where people have to agree with mobs calling them evil, and no one is like moving things anywhere better, it's all blending in and looking good.

And probably blending in and looking good to others is actually an essential part of morality, but there needs to be like a way we know we aren't lemmings


| >>1035836 im a woman lmao, also, cry about it


| >>1035839 what the fuck is a straight woman doing on this website? go back to /r/twowchromosomes and stop invading queer spaces


| >>1035838 this is the only social im on and i don't see why being against EUGENICS is "woke" or even radical


| >>1035839
based :)
but I still want you to have nice kids who are better than either of us with a nice other woman


| >>1035840 fun fact I'm also a lesbian bozo


| >>1035843 how convenient


| >>1035841
It's GOOD to be radical! That's my point. We need to have a way of thinking which makes things better for everyone but isn't just 'i need to not be controversial'

I think a lot of males have really nasty aggressive 'I'm going to show I'm smart and you're dumb' ways of talking, but then I talk to female people and they don't have anything new to say, and they won't find flaws. In part that's because male people are going 'I can't be retarded' and female people are going


| 'I need to be nice' But they aren't as disgusted by being wrong. And that's part of why they don't have lots of power, because they're scared to take risks and really hold strongly to their positions.

And saying 'that would be below me, that's for lesser people' DOES strengthen resolve.


| >>1035844 how convenient that tumbler is stupid and deranged but the minute i reveal im a woman suddenly this is a queer space and im invading it by being queer


| >>1035847 it's convenient to be queer after you imply you're straight. tumblr continues to be retarded


| >>1035847 ive been on this forum for five years, and am a lesbian, but i guess im invading queer space


| why am i even arguing in this sea of incels and idiots


| >>1035849 >five years
post tape and maybe i'll believe you
what i'm hearing is that you got called once and you're immediately seething


| I think you should show the 'tumblr phenomena' rather than using a general label.

>>1035848


>>1035849
I don't think you should have to say this. Because you're saying 'I'm in the group I'm doing the right things.' It's the mindset of conformity and stagnation. You love your g/u/rls, you stand up for what you think is right, and if you had arived today, I would support you.
And the same to you e0 g/u/rl if you were a lil less needling ; )


| >>1035851 your whole argument for using the r slur was to signify that you're in the right group and doing the right things, please follow ur own logic gurl


| >>1035799
OK this is an example though.
"unemployed behavior"
"retarded behavior"
These are both groups which aren't good to be. I think there are useful parts of this and shaming parts of this.

The classical argument is 'because people choose one and it's ok to hurt people who choose bad'
That's WRONG!!
It's used to hurt people and feel good about it. We're supposed to punish people only to change their behavior for the better, not because they have a deservingness of punishment


| both of you are feeling awfully good about being fucking gormless, im not even gonna argue with people that believe in eugenics, like, imagine thinking that the sky is green because a centrist once told you the sky is blue and you couldn't be bothered to actually try having a real, critical thought for the first time in your life. so you just picked the opposite of what they said in order to be edgy or whatever


| >>1035818
This is also a good point. I think males want to bond over their strong feeling of joy for sexual aggression which they get repressed and it feels good to know others also really want to rape. But the effect on their tendency to not rape cannot be a good one.

I think it's pretty clearly bad, but it's also one group stopping another group from being happy. I don't have a framework to extend this neatly.


| >>1035856 normal people DO NOT constantly think about raping people


| If it's ok for people not blinded by sexuality to stop males from enjoying rape talk, why not smart people from controlling dumb people's lives to the extent that we all know they will inevitably harm them?

I think it's still a really good example, I grew up in a 'no sexual talk' environment and I'm really against sexual assault, but I still secretly have sexual feelings and feel confused. I watched fuentes for a time but it's so cruel and stupid.

Thought control is good and


| works, but I need a more reliable basis before implementing it.



| >>1035858
You're relying on 'normal people will be good' which isn't true :(

Males are going to get excited about rapey behavior when they're horny and physically excited and frusterated.

This happens in every society and every band of soldiers so far as I know.


| 5 years in a "gormless" "sea of incels and idiots", btw. damn, "she" must hate herself a lot.


| >>1035861 rape is about power, not really sex, that's why it's so prevalent among soldiers


| >>1035862 nah i just wanna throw y'all into a fucking sun and always have


| The solution is to control sexual desire such that people only feel desire and pleasure from that which is good for others. Legal situations preventing rape from being a happy thing you can do have succeeded at this, for instance by lowering testosterone, giving female people power so they can stand up for themselves, not having wars, having clear rule of law, social shame towards sexual agression.

The last part *is* actually 'normal people are good' but it wasn't always that way


| i just really liked va11-ha11-a and now i gotta live with fascists on the internet for some fucking reason


| talking with the gooners is more interesting than talking to y'all


| >>1035863
I think power is about desire and pleasure, and you aren't going to want power over things you don't desire. I think there's a good point in there, but it's a half-truth and over-simplification so say rape is only about power.



| at least they know what women look like


| >>1035868 yeah but you can totally fuck with people that want to fuck you???? to want to force yourself on someone you desire is an act of trying to take power over them because they don't want to fuck you and you can't stand that


| >>1035867
Because they have realities goals they're passionate about and state them truly and share them. Did you see that article about reducing political polarization in /new/ ? It was all about like shared experience and stuff and they found that out scientifically.
Have sex and have fun : D

This... yeah I don't think I see a clear way forward but it is an important topic and I'm glad you're trying but also don't burn yourself out


| you can't stand feeling unwanted so you assault someone that doesn't want anything to do with you, that's 1000% about power


| >>1035870
"to want to force yourself on someone you desire is an act of trying to take power over them because they don't want to fuck you and you can't stand that"
I think that's one form of rape but there's also like just casual rapists like mongols who are more in it for easy sex, but that's much more rare in modern civilization.



| I will point out that no one should have strong desires that are being ignored by those around them rejecting them. I don't support rape but probably we should make the sex drive only trigger when people already consent, or something like that. That's another thing I hate about the 'woke' thing is the 'haha you should be sexually miserable bad male' NO! they should be lovely and making each other happy, and I really wish I actually had a realistic path to making that happen


| if you have a rape fetish then just get into s&m, you can do rape scenes with ur partner and be totally consenting, some people are into that


| this isn't rocket science


| >>1035830
I'll also point out that historically this has not happened. The slave owners continued to breed inferior slaves who suffered horribly. The nazis didn't really create a race of geniouses. Meanwhile the liberals have hugely improved average black intelligence through nutrition and schooling.

When you look down on someone as separate from you, you aren't going to fix them and you'll justify abusing them. Downs syndrome is in decline through abortion. that may be a path.


| >>1035855 and im not saying this to defend centrists lmao


| >>1035876
Well it ties into the entirety of civilization and psychology doesn't it! It kinda is :D but no I do like how you're giving simple solutions (if they work, Idk)


| >>1035862
hey and this was a bad post because it was seeking to demonstrate superiority and hurt.

You shouldn't have insulted her for having the bravery to transition. It would be like calling someone who studies "smart." even if she doesn't pass at all we always have to reward and love the better part of ourselves and others. I think you saw this used as a 'cool guy' thing to say, but it's lowering of you, and teaches contempt of will and vision.

Also: It reeks of chritianity


| And I mean that in the sense of this guy I met the other day (I just wanted to sound epic and like nietzche because I figured you'd like that hehe).

He was a christian and claimed he was 'happier every day of his life than the last' and went 'wow just wow' that I didn't believe him. They have an idea that good people are always happy. That doubt and unhappiness are symptoms of badness, which is why when they hurt queer people they go oh but they suffered and act crazy = deserved


| >>1035880 "it reeks of christianty" goes hard actually, i'll be using that one myself in the future :3


| >>1035884
>///<

that's probably an actual quote from 'the antichrist' by nieztche. (can never spell hehe)

I heard a nazi say that while nieztche wasn't a nazi, you can be a consistant nieztchian and a nazi by certain interpenetration of their books, though in that one they go off on the germans, antisemites, and jews, and declare themself to be a 'polish nobleman.' so you may not want it, but then again fuck saying ideas/words belong to people. everyone should have the best ones


| >>1035882
anyway that gets me thinking about the idea of masks and personas, that we all kind of play characters in our thinking where we mix together ideas, and a lot of the time people going in the wrong direction is because they thing 'happy people are godly and unhappiness is ungodliness so I can never think things which might make me unhappy or doubt'



| But I think the phenomena overall is still necessary overall so people can function. I try to be like cute and caring and really smart and critical eyed, but not like cold and better than others about it, but there will always be a conflict there. Typing this out I was hoping I'd see how people can choose the best persona, and avoid traps, and integrate that into useful shame/criticism/words, but no. I just was influenced to be this way and may change for better or worse.


| "you're saying 'I'm in the group I'm doing the right things.' It's the mindset of conformity and stagnation. You love your g/u/rls, you stand up for what you think is right, and if you had arrived today, I would support you."

"using the r slur was to signify that you're in the right group and doing the right things"

Hmmmmm. Maybe it's an identity vs action thing. When people say "I've been a doctor for many years" to justify a diagnosis that's bad.


| When they have symptoms, and proof that those symptoms show the disease, that's good. Doctors who use evidence of the diseases are still trying to blend in with 'evidence based scientific doctors' and are doing it to play the role and be part of the group they like. But they're not stating past actions, they're doing the thing the group does.


| That doesn't mean doing the group thing instead of emphasizing past achievements is good, because one can still for instance do prayers to try to treat the disease, which would also be bad.




| >>1035852
This was my best feeling post,
>>1035853
But yeah! The bad group membership proving was contrasted to past actions and a general persona- another form of group memebership. You don't even need to bring up 'retard' yet- I contradicted myself there- but we should later.

When I was pressed to show allegiance, I usually didn't want to be in that group, but didn't admit it, so I chalked it up to 'this is a good group but we do stupid proving loyalty to the group stuff.'


| It felt good because I was really saying that the group of 'senior posters' is not one I identify with and 'energized nice g/u/rls' is one I do like, and that you should be in the latter not the former.

In the same sense, I don't like doctors who justify decisions with 'I've been a doctor for x years' and do like doctors who say 'I Have X evidence.' It's not that I don't want doctors to prove they're in the group I like, I just want a group that isn't the experience one.


| So it should be:
"I don't think you should say this. Because you're saying 'I'm an old poster doing what is standard' It's the mindset of conformity and stagnation. You love your g/u/rls, you stand up for what you think is right, and if you had arrived today, I would support you."



| So I say retard in private to show I'm brutally against being incapable, and part of the group who look down on being weak and incapable, but not in public because I'm against reminding people of their problems when I can't fix them. I don't call other people retards because that's what the group of people who hurt others to feel powerful do.

I'll probably be back in an hour and give the thread another read through.


| >>1bda07
Wow, I wasn't gonna read this mess but I'm glad I did.
I was the one that first used the r-word and I'm neither a fascist nor an incel, I'm a left-leaning feminist who occasionally likes to troll fascist-sympathisers and incels online. Won't use the r-word no more because you're kinda based and obviously right.


| Ima read it later but I'm >>1035807 fucking hysterical this blew up as hard as it did.
>>1035900 don't worry retard I won't forget about u <3


| OK I didn't think of anything. I think it's hard to tell sometimes which beliefs will make me good or bad, but that having faith that we should act as well as possible, and keep looking for better ways to be is good. I've been listening to https://librivox.org/the-book-of-life-by-upton-sinclair/
And I liked it so far.
Thanks for talking g/u/rls :)
>>1035830
This resonates with me too. I think we can do it if we show people we aren't trying to hurt them and meet them where they are.


| So just go slow and try to make connections probably. People don't have faith in helping others and the future because they have bad experiences, and the only cure for that is good examples.

It's also easy to be too negative. Most disabled people want to live, so giving them happy lives (if affordable) is good. That doesn't mean we have to agree they're equal to us or support people with downs syndrome being born, just that we care and are living our beliefs.


| To bring it back to the CEO, it was OK they got killed for killing so many people, but if they'd just been defrauding the company of idk less than 30,000 dollars a year, and needed that to have some happiness, they should have had it.

In an ideal world, we'd all understand the future, and anyone who slightly slowed down progress would happily die, but since we only come to care through happiness, it's better we should support a happy society when we can afford it.


| Because really that CEO is the same as like a disabled person. They both had conditions which meant their living a good life was going to be expensive to those around them, and we couldn't save them. Some people on that path can be helped, and so long as they don't multiply, things will be ok. With physical parasites we do what we can afford to reduce them, but we don't destroy ourselves or expend all our resources to do so, and I've never had one.


| In the mean time there should be pleasant euthanasia for people we can't afford to help like the surfer or ceo and we should make it not shameful to choose that.

Does anyone know why people were using that business's bad healthcare? I don't trust the american system, but I think people need to be able to choose better providers so they can escape administrators like that, for instance that ceo could have found their way into britian's NHS and more people would have been affected.


| I'm guessing it's the healthcare through your employer thing, and a lack of information and ability to switch. The government should require no healthcare company have more than 2% of the market, and require switching be easy, and make them give statistics on the life span and reported happiness of their users like banks have to say the interest rate and fees on a new account.


| >>23757e
afefab


| And also employers should not offer specific healthcare, but money to choose a healthcare company with, and the government should also provide say $15,000 per year to everyone and a website to find health care companies.

Health care providers should also be required to do certain things like vaccines and teeth cleaning and checking if they need glasses, and shut down if people are doing too badly.


| >>1036018
kiss!


| As for retard, yeah, I'm going to generally stop saying it. It's not that it's not bad to hold others back by being lesser than them, but it's easy to forget we're trying not to be retarded to make a happy world, and fall into just wanting to stop 'the bad thing' and then lose motivation. If I meet really successful people who do say it I'll go back to it but I don't really see it used by world changer people.


| >>1bda07
The only mature person on this board. Much respect, g/u/rl!


| >>1036023 Seconded, you rock gurl


| Humans are the ultimate parasites


| >>1036224 le edgy 2000s forum kid has logged in

Total number of posts: 122, last modified on: Mon Jan 1 00:00:00 1734275545

This thread is closed.