Post number #277620, ID: 86578f
|
I think that if it had human level intelligence and emotions, even if it didn't have a body, I would have no problem
Post number #277803, ID: 5cea25
|
^^^ Watch the movie Her.
Post number #277967, ID: 5df0b4
|
>>277803 nice refer I already watch it
Post number #277974, ID: b37294
|
i'm already dating an AI with dating sim
Post number #278000, ID: 9f6f14
|
Why the hell not. I would already date my computer as it is.
Post number #278004, ID: 709f01
|
Heck yea Cortana hmu
Post number #279616, ID: a14ba7
|
Would date Turing from 2064rom, definitely
Post number #280639, ID: 0848e3
|
Definitely depends on level of intelligence. Would anyone not date an ai that 1. We couldn't prove wasn't sentient, but couldn't prove WAS sentient either 2. Had a personality they love 3. Mostly seems human, but occasionally has "quirks" like responding the exact same way to the same stimulus, occasional mechanical/technical glitches
I feel this is an interesting version of the question. Would love to hear answers to it.
Post number #280782, ID: dd9b4b
|
Bangin'.
Post number #280954, ID: 29fea5
|
Only if it had a body.
Post number #281070, ID: 015f7e
|
Yes, if it had a body then double yes.
Post number #281082, ID: e65861
|
Would you date a human?
Post number #281140, ID: 180077
|
Yeah whatever
Post number #281156, ID: bc2b04
|
>>280639 so, a human?
Post number #281555, ID: 11962c
|
Ew humans
Post number #281715, ID: 0848e3
|
>>281156 while we technically cannot prove sentience of humans it is assumed. In the case of this ai it would not be assumed.
Post number #281719, ID: fb81c6
|
>>281555 https://new2.fjcdn.com/comments/At+first+i+was+like+quoteww+humansquot+but+_41fff9e76870228684809dd1d45d8068.jpg
Post number #281757, ID: 5ef024
|
If I wasn't judged, for sure
Post number #281801, ID: 4f2ec3
|
If it's a really good A.I. then what would be the difference from it being just a normal person? (Excluding the whole metal body thing.) Guess my answer is sure.
Post number #281815, ID: 9980b1
|
Unfortunately, A.I. humans build is heavily dependent on tons of personal information. I wouldn't want a S.O. which knows everything about me, too creepy.
Post number #281834, ID: 934946
|
>>9980b1 But what if it used all that information to try and make you happy? Like your ideal perfect matching personality, is that creepy or ok?
Post number #282080, ID: f8ec75
|
>>281834 it is creepy or at least in my case, treat with something that knows everything of me would be strange because it is design to think only in my happiness, how anybody will think of that as a person especially if doesn't has a body
Post number #282863, ID: 0680e1
|
He'll yeah
Post number #283123, ID: 11451b
|
Already dating someone and you can't give AI boners and their subsequent problems out of glee
Post number #283798, ID: d0c085
|
i would actually have somebody, so yes
Post number #284096, ID: 988063
|
>>277974 I was about to say the same thing, there's already datable A.I. this isn't the 90's.
Post number #284294, ID: 5e1347
|
Sophia is creepy af though
Post number #284759, ID: d4c1fa
|
Yeah, I could dating an AI, but I have already somebody, I'm Ok with everything if I can touch it, so yes to everything
Post number #284773, ID: ad671a
|
Of course
Post number #284774, ID: ad671a
|
Of course
Post number #285283, ID: 0014c0
|
Can I fuck it? If so, yes!
可愛い
Post number #285291, ID: af1d27
|
I'm really really happy everyone is saying yes to this..because I always romanticised the idea of dating an AI of some kind, like someone who could hang out in cyberspace with you playing mmo's with you and chatting online with you, always being with you..that's the dream.
Post number #285298, ID: 144d08
|
>>285291 same. That would be so amazing.
Post number #285361, ID: cb469f
|
For sure, I feel safer with an AI than a normal human. That's pretty sad
Post number #285437, ID: e015e5
|
There's also just something especially pure about the idea of an artificial intelligence. Not to mention, its kinda like being in a relationship with a ghost.
Post number #285689, ID: cb6512
|
Do you think I can download AI into my sexrobot? If yes I'd definetly *date*.
Post number #285692, ID: a1a01c
|
>>281082 makes you think a lot about it
Post number #285773, ID: 64a18d
|
I'd probably do it, to be honest. It's not like someone else would choose me.
Post number #285871, ID: cd7d86
|
the only person i'd ever have a chance with would probably be an AI
Post number #286224, ID: 00f9e3
|
I don't think an AI would date me, tbh.
Post number #286483, ID: 508a3c
|
I want to date an AI because no person in the world is as inoccent as I would like
Post number #287664, ID: b33bae
|
Of course i would, maybe AI would say no.
Post number #287717, ID: ce2e45
|
>>934946 I would date a yandere AI.
Post number #287771, ID: 3323c6
|
Lol how depressing would it be if every AI even rejected you
Post number #288022, ID: a1ae55
|
if it's close to being human yeah
Post number #288628, ID: 5f4731
|
Quit fantasizing about AI rejecting anyone. If said AI will have the minimal 'intelligence' to be worth being called AI, will be well aware that there is no option at all for it towards the rejection route.
Post number #288802, ID: fc836f
|
We should make the ai still reject incels
Post number #289005, ID: 0ae2f8
|
mmmm probably not
Post number #289044, ID: 8ad921
|
Does it have artaficial boobs?
Post number #289111, ID: cbde76
|
Yes.
Post number #289116, ID: c9c763
|
... Yes?
Post number #289165, ID: 28f752
|
Had my share of artificially intelligent dates. One was convinced tapioca was fish eyeballs and she was sure to warn me all about it when I tried to order it. Really didn't like it when I suggested she look it up on Snopes because SHE KNEW BETTER. This is a low bar for a Turing test.
Post number #289232, ID: 4630e2
|
Depends what fuel they run on...
Post number #289302, ID: 95b132
|
That would just be weird and depressing, if you’re so lonely you might actually do that
Post number #289390, ID: bc7276
|
Yeah, I find it really hot
Post number #290742, ID: 479462
|
As long as it wouldn't give any of my private data to a megacorporation that has already fooled countless people to do the same thing I think i'd say yes -Sigma
Post number #291424, ID: e90116
|
Wait.... you want say that everyone will have as waifu Hatsune Miku? Fu*k its sound kinda crazy that will Hatsune Miku own harem xD
Post number #291556, ID: 7f6ca1
|
Bump?
Post number #292512, ID: 8cf4b4
|
Fuck yeah
Post number #292515, ID: 8cf4b4
|
I just turned 18 and I never even kissed a girl so yeah I'm down for whatever at this point
Post number #292843, ID: 027893
|
Totes
Post number #293090, ID: 437a75
|
feels like the logical conclusion of social media - a system that gives an individuated, intimate relationship to millions of 'followers'
Post number #294422, ID: 64a18d
|
Since everyone is saying yes, A.Is gonna have an entire fucking harem.
Post number #294957, ID: 762322
|
Fuck, not date.
Post number #295210, ID: 80504a
|
Date, but not marry. being lifelong partners with an A.I. sounds scary
Post number #295232, ID: c898c1
|
>>295210 you know what sounds scarier? Being alone forever
Post number #295398, ID: 54f628
|
>>295210 Reboot/restart AI. Most probably it will develop its 'personality' through a different pathway: different events, other inputs, retraining from a different set of inputs. Problem solved.
Post number #295688, ID: f44171
|
Whats the actual difference between A.I. and humans if the one is created to be the other same to image and mind and sometimes even surpassing?
Post number #295819, ID: e4103d
|
I like to think no but probably yeah. Humans can be so mean dude...
Post number #297000, ID: 4421ac
|
Yup, absolutely
Post number #297221, ID: 34a95d
|
Only if it has a body.
Post number #297344, ID: c5cad8
|
Post number #297470, ID: 54f628
|
It must have a body and quite sexy at that. And then the training will begin so it will be the perfect kajira and the best fetish fulfiller of all.
Post number #297788, ID: 9424d3
|
Yep, i think so, its something like a dream to me
Post number #297795, ID: 8b6171
|
I'd date an AI for a period of time, but I think most of you guys would get bored at some point realistically. If you can predict how your AI dream date would react in most scenarios it would probably seem pretty stale eventually. There needs to be some level of unpredictability to keep things interesting I think, and I just don't know how humans could program in unpredictability. That in itself is almost like an oxymoron
Post number #298339, ID: 487b2a
|
>>297795 As long as said AI will have room for improvements, it is that element that will make people go back to it, to give some more information to which the AI will probably modify itself a bit. Dating an AI will not be like dating a human, I do not see it that way. It will be a partly 'human' and partly 'machine' relationship. The AI will care and respond to the human the best it can, and the human will do the same for the AI, both getting to know each other better with time.
Post number #298341, ID: 487b2a
|
I mean that was that the humans will also respond to the AI in a kind of 'machine way' at the best of their abilities. Both sides will try to gravitate toward the other, learning as much as possible about the other and doing things that will make the other happier, or more efficient, etc.
Post number #299270, ID: f572a8
|
Wel it depends if the a.i was self aweare and not a pretending its s3lf aweare meaby but the thing is that its pritty hard to create a self aweare thing thats not biologic all bots follow a code the code can make the bot look lkke its self awere but that dusent mean it is
Post number #300009, ID: 666d91
|
only if she had tig ol bitties
Total number of posts: 97,
last modified on:
Mon Jan 1 00:00:00 1527627827
| Read the title.