This thread is permanently archived
Do futas need natural tits?
| women don't have penises, get off the internet and porn and touch grass
| Wrong.
Clearly not enough.
Don't lie to yourself.
| >"Go touch grass"
If you're saying that unironically you've been spending too much time online yourself. I go out to touch trans womans' cocks you virgin
| Now back onto the real question, at which cup size do crossdressers become girls for you people?
| >trans woman
Doesn't exist. You've had your fetish-addled mind manipulated by groomers and coomers. Words and clothes do not change biology. Fundamentally stupid question.
| For me, it's not about the size of the tits, it's about the shape of the bones, and the face, these two things are the most important criteria to label a person as a woman or a guy, personally.
You can tell when the bones are feminine or masculine, especially around the shape of the face.
| >>786234 i guess u re stoopid baka, becuz no one says biology doesn't exist when it comes to sex and genes.
A trans woman is a woman as her gender. Not her biological sex.
And personally, it matters more the physical appearance to be socially looked as a gender or the other.
Becuz 2 me, boobas and curves are gud
| And damn, there are a lot of hot trans women owo
| Gender doesn't exist.
| >>a2d4a9 You sound like the people on Twitter that Gianni Matragrano does voiceovers of.
You should get in touch - there's probably a bit of money in it for you.
| >>786234 inb4 this guy meets a hermaphrode and loses his mind over if they should wear a skirt or pants cause his whole understanding of biology is putting hotdogs into buns
| >>786241
He was much better when he wasn't parroting commie strawmen arguments.
>>786242
You're an idiot. This isn't about wearing what you want, it's about lying to yourself.
>>786240 >>786243
No, gender is intangible lunacy and definitely does NOT need to exist. The irony is that if it did exist you wouldn't want to wear a skirt and call yourself a woman because you'd have the gender of a man. Luckily for you, it's fake so you can LARP it being real because you're delusional.
| >>786244 i dunno man, I do think that gender does need to exist hehe
So it's my opinion against yours, why would your opinion be more valid than mine?
Just because you don't like something, it doesn't mean it has to be rejected by everyone.
So u loze diz discusion homie lmao
| >>786244 love seeing dudes just treat everything they disagree with as not real.
Don't worry this is all a bad dream, no one ever doubted you! Everything is as you think it is and you can go get your doctorate in biology now. Congratulations!
| Damn tho did this thread go to shit in a instant. Can't say fuck all without someone's grandmother ranting on how the world got too confusing for her now.
| >>786244
>saying get off the internet
>then malding over what someone who you will never meet or see says on the internet
| >Motherfuckers, they asked how big the tits of a fictional character have to be to be considered futa, you shit heads
Anyways, responding to op question, the matter of the thing is that futa do not require tits, only both male and female reproductive organs, they can be not visible sure, but that does complicate the classification, as long as coochie and peener are there, it's a futa.
The massive titties full of milk are just the cherry on top
This thread is permanently archived
| I was throwing Shimakaze lewds into a ero discord under #futa but admit told me it should be #crossdresser cause she got no tits or cuuchi in the pic, however they themselves posted Patchouli lewds with no pussy just above me! However they're fine with it cause she got "natural tits"?
So imo we both fucked up they aren't futas cause they aren't intersex, tho I found this tits argument wild. Liking girldick is gay only if she got no tits? Hypocrisy!
Flat is Justice!