Gooners/porn watchers has been proven to have less grey matter
Post number #1091163, ID: fac116
|
Literal brainlets
Post number #1091179, ID: fe05dc
|
Thats not how that works
Post number #1091180, ID: 22edec
|
still more brain cells than rightoid-kun no matter how much you goon
Post number #1091183, ID: dfc1df
|
Lewd artists are so good tho
Post number #1091192, ID: e891bf
|
>>1091180 lol true but rightoid-kun is a gooner too so she's a double brainlet
Post number #1091193, ID: e891bf
|
>>1091179 It actually does.
Post number #1091196, ID: 54755b
|
>>1091192 there's just an intellectual black hole in there at this point
Post number #1091197, ID: fac116
|
>>1091196 explains why she sucks so much to be around
Post number #1091285, ID: e5d95d
|
dunning-kruger thread
Post number #1091286, ID: 315778
|
>>1091285 dunning-krueger is a myth but gooners having less gray matter than non-gooners is scientifically proven
let me guess, you're a rightoid?
Post number #1091295, ID: d0181a
|
Can I just add grey food coloring to my cooking?
Post number #1091305, ID: c7973e
|
no you gotta take the methyline blue to get more blue matter in your brain (rfk jr. said that's better so you know it's true)
Post number #1091309, ID: 78432f
|
>>1091286 "scientifically proven" no. but whatever lets you feel like your own mediocre intelligence is marginally higher than your peers. *jacks off all over your face*
Post number #1091336, ID: 413d6a
|
>>1091309 It's true. Do you want to read the studies or do you want to fester in your ignorant denial some more?
Post number #1091339, ID: 6b55fd
|
>X is scientifically proven post >Look inside >Zero links to studies or even just their names
Many such cases
Post number #1091342, ID: 0cd879
|
>>1091339 I'll ask again, do you want to read the studies or do you want to fester in your ignorant denial some more? Because so far you've shown zero interest in science, facts and logic.
Post number #1091347, ID: 6b55fd
|
>>1091342 1. not samefag 2. post the studies gurl
Post number #1091349, ID: 13d83e
|
>>1091347 i think they mean this: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1874574
but a more recent study points to congitive functioning issues rather than actual loss of gray matter: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8080450
Post number #1091351, ID: 13d83e
|
still brainlets in some capacity in any case, just not literal brainlets.
Post number #1091366, ID: 6b55fd
|
>>1091349 gotta love the dichotomy of articles being "there might be a correlation but further studies are needed" and the headline being "this shit is proven without a shadow of a doubt"
First one hints at the reverse causation, so one is born a gooner. And second one about consequences of addiction causing some impairments as well.
But well, too much porn = bad, I don't need to be a scientist to tell you that. Doesn't mean just watching porn in general has such effects
Post number #1091367, ID: 6b55fd
|
In conclusion - OP needs to have their mouth fucked
Post number #1091368, ID: 8aca45
|
>>6b55fd Gooner trying to move the goalpost and spreading doubt. Also, you talk as if it's the first time you read a science article...
Post number #1091369, ID: 8aca45
|
>>1091367 Everything OP said was correct. Cope and seethe some more, rightoid-kun.
Total number of posts: 23,
last modified on:
Wed Jan 1 00:00:00 1777045941
| Literal brainlets