Post number #703384, ID: 5b024c
|
What would be the most realistic way to build a time machine In theory? Resources needed, the science and cost.
Post number #703485, ID: 3c6c31
|
there's those things based on einstein relativity but you need infinite mass/energy nor negative energy.
Post number #703507, ID: b6fef5
|
timetravel_0 had a totally legit time machine! you can try building it and tell us if it works! :) :O
Post number #703513, ID: 52f11e
|
watch primer
Post number #703621, ID: be80e3
|
Well if you're interested in the science of time travel and stuff there's the PBS Space-time channel to watch(or if you're genuinely interested in physics i sincerely reccomend starting from elementary physics instead of going into the super complex stuff like quantum mechanics,helps build a strong foundation and love for the subject)
Post number #703668, ID: 7371d6
|
Way I see it, there ain't no difference between a flying saucer and a time machine. People get so hung up on specifics, they miss out on seeing the whole thing.
Post number #704028, ID: 8aa68a
|
supposedly just go beyond light speed
Post number #704033, ID: d03a5e
|
>>704028 That would just cause you to "Time travel" into the future
Post number #704086, ID: 8aa68a
|
>>704033 nop the theory is close to light travel and light travel makes you travel to the future. But if you ever to manage to go faster you go into the past
Post number #704093, ID: 3c6c31
|
>>704086 Well this theory, restraint relativity, was made using the fact that you can't go faster than light. Thou general relativity can admit past time travel form of spacetime. But you need infinite energy
Total number of posts: 10,
last modified on:
Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1602258436
| What would be the most realistic way to build a time machine In theory? Resources needed, the science and cost.