Post number #656820, ID: f24432
|
I want to publish an open source app that should never become closed source.
on another note, can I make closed source alterations to it after publishing it in GPL? or will the GNU project be able to sue me for making my own GPL app proprietary again ? :p
Post number #656825, ID: f24432
|
nevermind me I guess, the 2nd question has been answered: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/331846/dual-license-with-gpl-and-a-closed-source-license
Post number #656893, ID: 4fb386
|
Use WTFPL
Post number #656966, ID: a5f8b1
|
I really want something simple as bsd but copyleft and viral, good luck with the license hunt op
Post number #657275, ID: 4fb386
|
Restrictive licences are cancer. So closed source is cancer, as mjch as 'viral" open source licences.
Post number #657346, ID: a5f8b1
|
>>657275 you're a cancer
Post number #657888, ID: 4fb386
|
>>657346 And you're salty because you're one of those stupid elitists who believe that removing free will from others is good because you're right and they're wrong.
Post number #657925, ID: 3cc297
|
>>a5f8b1>>4fb386 Calm down, gurls.
Post number #657933, ID: 14a891
|
>>657888 Nice strawman.
Post number #658249, ID: a5f8b1
|
>>657888 should people be allowed to own things?
Total number of posts: 10,
last modified on:
Wed Jan 1 00:00:00 1590373800
| I want to publish an open source app that should never become closed source.
on another note, can I make closed source alterations to it after publishing it in GPL? or will the GNU project be able to sue me for making my own GPL app proprietary again ? :p