Post number #582529, ID: 52c1a6
|
I've been toying around with Common Lisp and Racket and I'm not sure which I like better.
Post number #582538, ID: 45c1f4
|
))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Post number #582641, ID: 9ca043
|
>>582538 Aaaaah you beat me to it
Post number #582713, ID: ab66a9
|
Haha, I should have put that in my original comment! Apparently, old Lisps would end with 80 or so ')' just to make sure that there were enough.
>onyx torus realm
Post number #582855, ID: 45c1f4
|
>>582713 correct! lisp is self-aware of being overloaded with parentheses, so it just accepts as many additional parentheses as ya give it. though that usually just looks really fucking messy and offworldish, making the super parenthese or ] useful as hecc; it essentially just makes up for as many closing parentheses as you need.
Post number #582858, ID: a033f3
|
This thread is making me want to learn Lisp It looks so exotic and outlandish
Post number #582885, ID: edfbc2
|
>>582855 Huh, I didn't know about the "super parentheses". Is that part of Common Lisp, or a different one?
Post number #582895, ID: f12f8a
|
fov fure bvo
Post number #582966, ID: 45c1f4
|
>>582885 fairly certain it's a Common Lisp thing, but it does pop up in other dialects. Interlisp, off the top of my head.
Total number of posts: 9,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1564064220
| I've been toying around with Common Lisp and Racket and I'm not sure which I like better.