Post number #284628, ID: aef007
|
What do you use for browsing, gurls? I use IceCat regularly, but some bugs it has (and the lack of functional add-ons) are making me look for alternatives.
Post number #284713, ID: e13043
|
Chrome
Post number #284812, ID: 150d64
|
>>284713 Chrome is not free (as in freedom) There is chromium, thought... I use Waterfox and looking forward to Falkon (former qupzilla, belongs to KDE now).
Post number #284816, ID: 078725
|
DuckDuck go is best
Post number #284818, ID: c9ce68
|
I use Brave.
/tech/ gurls only use free browsers not owned by bad corpos.
Post number #284837, ID: 0f86a1
|
Chromium
Post number #284926, ID: d07cd2
|
>Brave Ponzi Inc. >Mozilla Corp. (subsidiary of Soros Industries) >Debian Foundation (subsidiary of Poetthering Enterprises and SystemD Software) >Alphabet Inc. >not owned by bad corpos. Alrighty then
Post number #284940, ID: 0f86a1
|
>>284926 are you one of these alt righters who believe Soros wants to destroy Europe or somethin? just kys
Post number #285069, ID: b2c252
|
Soros?
Post number #285081, ID: 5d0b5f
|
w3m
Post number #285472, ID: 3d224e
|
>>285069 Some rich jew giving money to pro-immigration groups and left extremists
Post number #285797, ID: 0d17be
|
>>285472 1. It's by far not the worst thing rich people do. It's not even a bad thing at all tbh. 2. This is about "free browsers" not about antisemite conspiracy theroies 3. Follow your leader: http://www.lowbird.com/data/images/2010/08/follow-your-leader-by-esonax.jpg 4. asshole!
Post number #285836, ID: fc90bf
|
I like qutebrowser. Pretty chill maintainers and I like doin stuff from the keyboard (keyboard drivwn browser)
Post number #285843, ID: fc90bf
|
Also its qute af
Post number #286091, ID: b9a0d3
|
>>285836 qutebrowser is ok, but I am not the fan of its default search engine and lack of customisation
Post number #286590, ID: 8d7b20
|
Firefox Mozilla, I like it's policy
Post number #287350, ID: 246f7c
|
Nig
NSCA Mosaic ftw
Post number #287478, ID: cdd8f6
|
OP here. I moved to WaterFox, it doesn't have as much security tools as IceCat, but it has the add-ons I like and feels more stable.
I may use IceCat again in the future if the devs keep working at it.
Do you guys know if WaterFox has any downsides or problems?
Post number #287498, ID: 50b459
|
>>285472 more like giving money to centrist liberal groups lmao
Post number #287499, ID: 50b459
|
>>287478 What add-ons are you talking about?
Post number #287517, ID: d63042
|
>>287499 A RSS reader and something to run run user scripts. There are add-ons for that for IceCat, but none of them work; also themes, of all the themes listed in the official site, only one worked.
Post number #287518, ID: d63042
|
Total number of posts: 22,
last modified on:
Wed Jan 1 00:00:00 1526684842
| What do you use for browsing, gurls?
I use IceCat regularly, but some bugs it has (and the lack of functional add-ons) are making me look for alternatives.