Post number #181610, ID: d2d2a4
|
-Should be continue the hunt for sodium-based batteries, hydrogen fuel cells, or proton batteries? -What devices would and wouldn't benefit from these? -Screw lithium.
Post number #181651, ID: 6e711e
|
You mean, nuclear reactors? Those things are hueg and probably need too much water for cooling IMO.
Post number #183309, ID: f9bb55
|
Lol I've read „person batteries“
Post number #183631, ID: 9baf29
|
how do u charge batery on protoin powder?????
Post number #185885, ID: 822958
|
I think they might be actually viable. They don't have carbon emissions and in fact use carbon and water. They are also rechargeable. Don't know about their cost though.
Post number #186842, ID: 439584
|
Proton batteries? lol
Post number #186998, ID: 08394b
|
>>185885 Are we talking about hydrogen fuel cells? Those things are inefficient, and produces one too many heat to ever be useful in applications requiring small footprint.
Post number #187220, ID: 6525a7
|
>>186998 I do not know about proton bateries, but hydrogen fuel cells and hydrogen as a fuel in general is only a joke and a pipedream for the uninitiated.
It is from things like these how one can distinguish in a conversation the properly educated and who know what they speak about, apart from the hipsters who mistake fantasy and reality with each other.
Post number #187279, ID: bf6131
|
>dumb niggers don't know that hydrogen = protons lolololo
Post number #187307, ID: 6525a7
|
>>187279 This is what you get when you believe a battery and a fuel cell are the same things.
Post number #187312, ID: 1b249f
|
>>187279 I blame chemistry for that. Particle physics clearly defined it, but chemist had to be like "muh, no, this protium is called proton and you can't object."
Total number of posts: 11,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1521137459
| -Should be continue the hunt for sodium-based batteries, hydrogen fuel cells, or proton batteries?
-What devices would and wouldn't benefit from these?
-Screw lithium.