Post number #1072384, ID: 998481
|
Discuss the best programming language
Post number #1072393, ID: 9c78ed
|
I politely decline
Post number #1072398, ID: 0082e0
|
english
Post number #1072421, ID: bba1b5
|
I think a better question would be whats the worst programming language, because most languages have their own use, python for just throwing something together quickly, C for pure speed, c++ or rust for slightly less speed but it's much more user friendly and clean, Lua is great because it's so small you can put it in anything. Hate Java tho fuck Java it's actually just bad, so is react. Js is just okay, good for websites. Ruby is too much bloat but still decent imo. Meow meow meow
Post number #1072453, ID: fe9406
|
Meow meow ^^
Post number #1072478, ID: 15053b
|
Please, for the love of god, google and read "The Emperors Old Clothes" by Hoare. In this speech he, a world-renowned programming language designer, goes on record saying Ada is abysmal dogshit and a threat to national security.
Post number #1072510, ID: 1f6be3
|
C Only C, only hardcore! ..maybe also a bit of Shell <: //ok-ok, Ada is nice language, maybe onetime I'll try it
Post number #1072513, ID: 1f6be3
|
>>1072421 Meow! Let's hate Java together! I tend to agree with the rest
Post number #1072537, ID: 9c78ed
|
eeh... CPP, Java, C in that order for how usefull they are. Everything else can go away and nothing of value would be lost.
Post number #1072576, ID: bcbbc7
|
>>1072478 Just read through it. I sympathize with but don't fully buy the complexity argument. After all, a programming language is supposed to provide conveniences over writing machine code. I think implementation complexity is a valid price to pay here. Additionally, I think Ada limits itself to a good set of features useful for its goal of embedded programming. There are e-mails from Jean Ichbiah, protesting the addition of more features, so they too were aware of the tradeoff.
Post number #1072577, ID: bcbbc7
|
Also the idea of having specialized extensions of the language for different purposes sounds funny in this era of proliferation of libraries. Can you imagine if there were multiple versions of Python, one specialized to deep learning, another specialized to webdev? Being able to easily use all features of the language and combine different field within a single program is very useful.
Post number #1072620, ID: 1f6be3
|
>>1072537 What about POSIX Shell or bash, or C-shell (like tcsh/csh)?
Post number #1072680, ID: 9c78ed
|
>>1072620 That's not a programming lang, but a scripting one.
Post number #1072810, ID: 1f6be3
|
>>1072680 Oh, yes, forgot that little nuance, thank you!
Post number #1072814, ID: 9c78ed
|
>>1072537 Also i'm not saying the're perfect. The're are the best we have, in their fields. And currently as is, i've seen them be replaced for "better langs", by "better educated devs". (Which if they truly were, they wouldn't need the crutces of quick and dirty implementations or compleate compile safety)
Some people just shouldn't touch some projects; Shouldn't work on something that works well as is.
Post number #1072853, ID: 1b4a0f
|
>>1072680 Whats the difference, anyways?
Post number #1072857, ID: 9c78ed
|
>>1072853 a programming language gets translated (or "compiled") into actuall machine code a processor understands.
a stripting language. gets read by (usually) anoter compiled program. and then that program does the actuall stuff. (aka. the script being interpreted at runtime)
and then there's java which is wierd mix of both (although for some reason still considered programming)
i don't fucking know what java is i also still consider it programming even though it doesn't fit
Post number #1073014, ID: 1f6be3
|
>>1072814 Agree.
Total number of posts: 18,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1758831256
| Discuss the best programming language