Post number #1025886, ID: f74842
|
I've been using vim, neovim, and visual studio code. You girls know any other things i could use? I use both windows and Linux interchangeably. Ty ty love you *muwah*
Post number #1025892, ID: c6c602
|
Awww thanks mwah! My friend who’s smart uses notepad++ for some stuff. I use jetbrains for some school assignments but not well. Someone in an internet chat told me to use lapce
Post number #1025928, ID: 19fe45
|
I use keyboard, but sometime I write the character in paint and use yandex to turn it into texts too. Lately I try using google's voice search to write too. I hope that help! Have a good day :)
Best regard
-THE TRANNY FIGHTER-
Post number #1025964, ID: f74842
|
>>1025892 ohh Lapce looks pretty cool, ty gurl I'll try it tmmr
Post number #1025989, ID: 15fdef
|
The standard editor, ed
Post number #1025990, ID: 15fdef
|
For a less meme answer, I like emacs with evil mode (vimkeys > emacs keybinds for editing imo) and ido-mode since I prefer being able to type part of a filename to switch to that buffer over hunting down a tab to click on (and prefer how this looks/works with ido-mode rather than without), but there are probably other editors that make that kind of search just as easy
Post number #1025993, ID: 911943
|
Been using Sublime Text and it's served me just fine. Could read giant text files that'd kill other editors, no problem.
Post number #1026009, ID: 4dcecf
|
>>1025964 I’ll be interested to hear the verdict!
Post number #1026164, ID: 88db07
|
i like emacs. i personally find it easier to get lots of work done, because of buffers and all of it's built in tools. also it's keybindings were simpler, though i prefer hjkl for moving around text, i can't really wrap my head around all of vi's other keys (maybe someday i'll remember all of them). my config is based around uncle dave's
Post number #1026177, ID: 20f6e0
|
nano
Post number #1026255, ID: a17f51
|
>>1025993 I also like sublime (mainly when I'm using a Mac OR as mentioned for really long files) but otherwise vim all the way. It was what I learned first and so I'm comfortable with it, anything else is too clunky for my goofy ass to learn
Post number #1026284, ID: c49f89
|
vi
Post number #1026285, ID: c49f89
|
It generally depends on the language. For example, for [La]TeX, it is probably better to take Textmaker (or an advanced version, TeXstudio), but notepad++ remains a favorite (we categorically do not support the developers' policy), it is a pity that there is no native analogue for Linux. (notepadqq is bad piece of known substance).
Post number #1026286, ID: c49f89
|
>Textmaker TeXmaker of course.
Post number #1026348, ID: efc929
|
>>1025886 try nano. it's really easy and simple to use
Post number #1026400, ID: c49f89
|
yes, nano is nice one.
Post number #1026458, ID: dea8bc
|
Nano shinonome
Post number #1026475, ID: 1cc69b
|
atom is also nice
Post number #1026485, ID: 0420b9
|
>>1026475 but it deprecated. Hears that pulsar is idea successor of atom.
Post number #1026508, ID: becbb5
|
Vscode for code, sublime for logs/random text files
Post number #1026605, ID: d777f6
|
Eclipse
Post number #1026680, ID: 0420b9
|
I think the best will be use Scintilla the text engine, and it will be so awesome if someones port (make analogue) of notepad++ (we categorically do not support the policy of developers) on linux using C (not C++) and without java, javascript, python, lua and etc. (posix shell script is allowed).
Total number of posts: 22,
last modified on:
Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1725531784
| I've been using vim, neovim, and visual studio code. You girls know any other things i could use? I use both windows and Linux interchangeably. Ty ty love you *muwah*